Kali Metals Ltd
Kali Metals Limited explores mineral properties in Australia. The company explores for gold, lithium, cesium, and tantalum pegmatite deposits, as well as other critical minerals. Kali Metals Limited was incorporated in 2021 and is based in West Perth, Australia.
Market Cap & Net Worth: Kali Metals Ltd (KM1)
Kali Metals Ltd (AU:KM1) has a market capitalization of $16.28 Million (AU$26.29 Million) as of March 19, 2026. Listed on the AU stock exchange, this Australia-based company holds position #30976 globally and #926 in its home market, demonstrating a -8.33% decrease in market value over the past year.
Market capitalization, also known as net worth in stock markets, is calculated by multiplying Kali Metals Ltd's stock price AU$0.17 by its total outstanding shares 159311706 (159.31 Million).
Kali Metals Ltd Market Cap History: 2024 to 2026
Kali Metals Ltd's market capitalization history from 2024 to 2026. Data shows change from $11.84 Million to $16.28 Million (-35.74% CAGR).
Kali Metals Ltd Market Cap to Earnings & Revenue Ratios Timeline
This chart shows how Kali Metals Ltd's valuation ratios have evolved. The Price to Sales (P/S) ratio compares market cap to revenue, while the Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio compares market cap to net income. Lower values may indicate a more undervalued company relative to its financial performance.
Latest Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio
44.02x
Kali Metals Ltd's market cap is 44.02 times its annual revenue
3.49x
Higher than industry averageLatest Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio
N/A
P/E ratio not applicable due to negative or zero earnings
What These Ratios Tell Investors:
- Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's sales. Lower P/S ratios may indicate undervaluation.
- Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's earnings. This is one of the most common valuation metrics.
- Trends in these ratios over time can indicate changing investor sentiment about the company's future growth prospects.
- Industry comparison provides context for whether the company is valued higher or lower than peers.
| Year | Market Cap (USD) | Revenue (USD) | Net Income (USD) | P/S Ratio | P/E Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | $11.84 Million | $315.45K | -$1.04 Million | 37.52x | N/A |
| 2025 | $17.76 Million | $403.33K | -$2.75 Million | 44.02x | N/A |
Competitor Companies of KM1 by Market Capitalization
Companies near Kali Metals Ltd in the global market cap rankings as of March 19, 2026.
Key companies related to Kali Metals Ltd by market ranking:
- BHP Group Limited (NYSE:BHP): Ranked #82 globally with a market cap of $188.50 Billion USD.
- RIO Tinto Ltd (AU:RIO): Ranked #133 globally with a market cap of $138.56 Billion USD ( AU$223.77 Billion AUD).
- Rio Tinto Group (PINK:RTNTF): Ranked #206 globally with a market cap of $97.13 Billion USD.
- Glencore PLC (PINK:GLCNF): Ranked #724 globally with a market cap of $27.97 Billion USD.
| Rank | Company | Symbol | Market Cap | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #82 | BHP Group Limited | NYSE:BHP | $188.50 Billion | $68.30 |
| #133 | RIO Tinto Ltd | AU:RIO | $138.56 Billion | AU$156.38 |
| #206 | Rio Tinto Group | PINK:RTNTF | $97.13 Billion | $67.88 |
| #724 | Glencore PLC | PINK:GLCNF | $27.97 Billion | $3.02 |
Kali Metals Ltd Historical Marketcap From 2024 to 2026
Between 2024 and today, Kali Metals Ltd's market cap moved from $11.84 Million to $ 16.28 Million, with a yearly change of -35.74%.
| Year | Market Cap | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | AU$16.28 Million | -8.33% |
| 2025 | AU$17.76 Million | +50.00% |
| 2024 | AU$11.84 Million | -- |
End of Day Market Cap According to Different Sources
On Mar 19th, 2026 the market cap of Kali Metals Ltd was reported to be:
| Source | Market Cap |
|---|---|
| Yahoo Finance | $16.28 Million USD |
| MoneyControl | $16.28 Million USD |
| MarketWatch | $16.28 Million USD |
| marketcap.company | $16.28 Million USD |
| Reuters | $16.28 Million USD |
Market cap values may vary slightly between sources due to differences in calculation methods, timing, and data refresh rates.