Lightning Minerals Ltd
Lightning Minerals Ltd engages in the exploration of minerals that include lithium, gold, base metals, nickel, copper, and PGEs. The company holds 100% interests in the Dundas, Mt Jewell, Mailman Hill, and Mt Bartle projects. Lightning Minerals Ltd was incorporated in 2021 and is based in Perth, Australia.
Market Cap & Net Worth: Lightning Minerals Ltd (L1M)
Lightning Minerals Ltd (AU:L1M) has a market capitalization of $3.18 Million (AU$5.13 Million) as of March 18, 2026. Listed on the AU stock exchange, this Australia-based company holds position #37117 globally and #1432 in its home market, demonstrating a -2.63% decrease in market value over the past year.
Market capitalization, also known as net worth in stock markets, is calculated by multiplying Lightning Minerals Ltd's stock price AU$0.02 by its total outstanding shares 277328319 (277.33 Million).
Lightning Minerals Ltd Market Cap History: 2022 to 2026
Lightning Minerals Ltd's market capitalization history from 2022 to 2026. Data shows change from $28.33 Million to $3.18 Million (-53.52% CAGR).
Lightning Minerals Ltd Market Cap to Earnings & Revenue Ratios Timeline
This chart shows how Lightning Minerals Ltd's valuation ratios have evolved. The Price to Sales (P/S) ratio compares market cap to revenue, while the Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio compares market cap to net income. Lower values may indicate a more undervalued company relative to its financial performance.
Latest Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio
No P/S ratio data available
Latest Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio
No P/E ratio data available
What These Ratios Tell Investors:
- Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's sales. Lower P/S ratios may indicate undervaluation.
- Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's earnings. This is one of the most common valuation metrics.
- Trends in these ratios over time can indicate changing investor sentiment about the company's future growth prospects.
- Industry comparison provides context for whether the company is valued higher or lower than peers.
| Year | Market Cap (USD) | Revenue (USD) | Net Income (USD) | P/S Ratio | P/E Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No financial ratio data available | |||||
Competitor Companies of L1M by Market Capitalization
Companies near Lightning Minerals Ltd in the global market cap rankings as of March 18, 2026.
Key companies related to Lightning Minerals Ltd by market ranking:
- BHP Group Limited (NYSE:BHP): Ranked #83 globally with a market cap of $188.50 Billion USD.
- RIO Tinto Ltd (AU:RIO): Ranked #136 globally with a market cap of $137.49 Billion USD ( AU$222.06 Billion AUD).
- Rio Tinto Group (PINK:RTNTF): Ranked #208 globally with a market cap of $97.13 Billion USD.
- Glencore PLC (PINK:GLCNF): Ranked #728 globally with a market cap of $27.97 Billion USD.
| Rank | Company | Symbol | Market Cap | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #83 | BHP Group Limited | NYSE:BHP | $188.50 Billion | $70.48 |
| #136 | RIO Tinto Ltd | AU:RIO | $137.49 Billion | AU$155.18 |
| #208 | Rio Tinto Group | PINK:RTNTF | $97.13 Billion | $67.88 |
| #728 | Glencore PLC | PINK:GLCNF | $27.97 Billion | $3.02 |
Lightning Minerals Ltd Historical Marketcap From 2022 to 2026
Between 2022 and today, Lightning Minerals Ltd's market cap moved from $28.33 Million to $ 3.18 Million, with a yearly change of -53.52%.
| Year | Market Cap | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | AU$3.18 Million | -26.00% |
| 2025 | AU$4.29 Million | -65.28% |
| 2024 | AU$12.36 Million | -48.57% |
| 2023 | AU$24.04 Million | -15.15% |
| 2022 | AU$28.33 Million | -- |
End of Day Market Cap According to Different Sources
On Mar 18th, 2026 the market cap of Lightning Minerals Ltd was reported to be:
| Source | Market Cap |
|---|---|
| Yahoo Finance | $3.18 Million USD |
| MoneyControl | $3.18 Million USD |
| MarketWatch | $3.18 Million USD |
| marketcap.company | $3.18 Million USD |
| Reuters | $3.18 Million USD |
Market cap values may vary slightly between sources due to differences in calculation methods, timing, and data refresh rates.