NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF

BATS:NIHI USA
Market Cap
$475.30K
Market Cap Rank
#37553 Global
#12230 in USA
Share Price
$49.89
Change (1 day)
+0.50%
52-Week Range
$48.50 - $53.35
All Time High
$53.35
About

Under normal circumstances, the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets, plus borrowings for investment purposes, in securities of companies included in the international index. The fund executes this portion of the strategy by investing in one or more international Underlying ETFs and/or a portfolio of stocks that make up the international index.

Market Cap & Net Worth: NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI)

NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (BATS:NIHI) has a market capitalization of $475.30K ($475.30K) as of March 19, 2026. Listed on the BATS stock exchange, this USA-based company holds position #37553 globally and #12230 in its home market, demonstrating a -0.48% decrease in market value over the past year.

Market capitalization, also known as net worth in stock markets, is calculated by multiplying NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF's stock price $49.89 by its total outstanding shares 9527 (9.53K).

NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF Market Cap History: 2025 to 2026

NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF's market capitalization history from 2025 to 2026. Data shows growth from $483.50K to $475.30K (0.00% CAGR).

NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF Market Cap to Earnings & Revenue Ratios Timeline

This chart shows how NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF's valuation ratios have evolved. The Price to Sales (P/S) ratio compares market cap to revenue, while the Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio compares market cap to net income. Lower values may indicate a more undervalued company relative to its financial performance.

Latest Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio

No P/S ratio data available

Latest Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio

No P/E ratio data available

What These Ratios Tell Investors:
  • Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's sales. Lower P/S ratios may indicate undervaluation.
  • Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's earnings. This is one of the most common valuation metrics.
  • Trends in these ratios over time can indicate changing investor sentiment about the company's future growth prospects.
  • Industry comparison provides context for whether the company is valued higher or lower than peers.
Year Market Cap (USD) Revenue (USD) Net Income (USD) P/S Ratio P/E Ratio
No financial ratio data available

Competitor Companies of NIHI by Market Capitalization

Companies near NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF in the global market cap rankings as of March 19, 2026.

Key companies related to NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF by market ranking:

  • RECORDATI (BE:RER1): Ranked #37544 globally with a market cap of $493.65K USD ( €480.92K EUR).
  • Bowler Metcalf Ltd (JSE:BCF): Ranked #37545 globally with a market cap of $493.42K USD ( ZAC928.44 Million ZAC).
  • Xali Gold Corp (PINK:CGDXF): Ranked #37554 globally with a market cap of $491.02K USD.
  • NGS Group AB (publ) (ST:NGS): Ranked #37555 globally with a market cap of $490.92K USD ( Skr5.51 Million SEK).

Market capitalization comparison (in billions USD)
Rank Company Symbol Market Cap Price
#37544 RECORDATI BE:RER1 $493.65K €48.48
#37545 Bowler Metcalf Ltd JSE:BCF $493.42K ZAC1425.00
#37554 Xali Gold Corp PINK:CGDXF $491.02K $0.00
#37555 NGS Group AB (publ) ST:NGS $490.92K Skr2.34

NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF Historical Marketcap From 2025 to 2026

Between 2025 and today, NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF's market cap moved from $483.50K to $ 475.30K, with a yearly change of 0.00%.

Year Market Cap Change (%)
2026 $475.30K -1.69%
2025 $483.50K --

End of Day Market Cap According to Different Sources

On Mar 18th, 2026 the market cap of NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF was reported to be:

Source Market Cap
Yahoo Finance $475.30K USD
MoneyControl $475.30K USD
MarketWatch $475.30K USD
marketcap.company $475.30K USD
Reuters $475.30K USD

Market cap values may vary slightly between sources due to differences in calculation methods, timing, and data refresh rates.