Mercantile Shipping Company PLC
Mercantile Shipping Company PLC operates in various business sectors.
Market Cap & Net Worth: Mercantile Shipping Company PLC (MSLN0000)
Mercantile Shipping Company PLC (CM:MSLN0000) has a market capitalization of $16.12K (SLRs4.70 Million) as of March 18, 2026. Listed on the CM stock exchange, this Sri Lanka-based company holds position #44113 globally and #30 in its home market, demonstrating a -7.84% decrease in market value over the past year.
Market capitalization, also known as net worth in stock markets, is calculated by multiplying Mercantile Shipping Company PLC's stock price SLRs511.50 by its total outstanding shares 9191 (9.19K).
Mercantile Shipping Company PLC Market Cap History: 2015 to 2025
Mercantile Shipping Company PLC's market capitalization history from 2015 to 2025. Data shows growth from $3.02K to $16.12K (18.85% CAGR).
Mercantile Shipping Company PLC Market Cap to Earnings & Revenue Ratios Timeline
This chart shows how Mercantile Shipping Company PLC's valuation ratios have evolved. The Price to Sales (P/S) ratio compares market cap to revenue, while the Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio compares market cap to net income. Lower values may indicate a more undervalued company relative to its financial performance.
Latest Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio
No P/S ratio data available
Latest Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio
No P/E ratio data available
What These Ratios Tell Investors:
- Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's sales. Lower P/S ratios may indicate undervaluation.
- Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's earnings. This is one of the most common valuation metrics.
- Trends in these ratios over time can indicate changing investor sentiment about the company's future growth prospects.
- Industry comparison provides context for whether the company is valued higher or lower than peers.
| Year | Market Cap (USD) | Revenue (USD) | Net Income (USD) | P/S Ratio | P/E Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No financial ratio data available | |||||
Competitor Companies of MSLN0000 by Market Capitalization
Companies near Mercantile Shipping Company PLC in the global market cap rankings as of March 18, 2026.
Key companies related to Mercantile Shipping Company PLC by market ranking:
- Streamex Corp (NASDAQ:STEX): Ranked #44104 globally with a market cap of $16.79K USD.
- PARAGON - Dusseldorf Stock Exchang (DU:PGN): Ranked #44105 globally with a market cap of $16.78K USD ( €16.35K EUR).
- Avenir Wellness Solutions Inc. (PINK:AVRW): Ranked #44114 globally with a market cap of $16.61K USD.
- CAFE DE CORAL HLDG (MU:XCD): Ranked #44115 globally with a market cap of $16.60K USD ( €16.17K EUR).
| Rank | Company | Symbol | Market Cap | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #44104 | Streamex Corp | NASDAQ:STEX | $16.79K | $1.83 |
| #44105 | PARAGON - Dusseldorf Stock Exchang | DU:PGN | $16.78K | €1.80 |
| #44114 | Avenir Wellness Solutions Inc. | PINK:AVRW | $16.61K | $0.02 |
| #44115 | CAFE DE CORAL HLDG | MU:XCD | $16.60K | €1.73 |
Mercantile Shipping Company PLC Historical Marketcap From 2015 to 2025
Between 2015 and today, Mercantile Shipping Company PLC's market cap moved from $3.02K to $ 16.12K, with a yearly change of 18.85%.
| Year | Market Cap | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SLRs16.12K | +151.66% |
| 2024 | SLRs6.40K | +26.05% |
| 2023 | SLRs5.08K | -28.73% |
| 2022 | SLRs7.13K | +117.55% |
| 2021 | SLRs3.28K | +27.92% |
| 2020 | SLRs2.56K | +35.50% |
| 2019 | SLRs1.89K | -10.45% |
| 2018 | SLRs2.11K | +11.67% |
| 2017 | SLRs1.89K | -4.15% |
| 2016 | SLRs1.97K | -34.79% |
| 2015 | SLRs3.02K | -- |
End of Day Market Cap According to Different Sources
On Mar 17th, 2026 the market cap of Mercantile Shipping Company PLC was reported to be:
| Source | Market Cap |
|---|---|
| Yahoo Finance | $16.12K USD |
| MoneyControl | $16.12K USD |
| MarketWatch | $16.12K USD |
| marketcap.company | $16.12K USD |
| Reuters | $16.12K USD |
Market cap values may vary slightly between sources due to differences in calculation methods, timing, and data refresh rates.