LUKA KOPER d.d.
Luka Koper d.d. provides seaport and logistics system services in the Port of Koper located in Slovenia. It provides container, car and RO-RO, general cargo, reefer, timber terminal, dry bulk terminal, silo, alumina, iron ore and coal, liquid cargo, livestock, cruise terminal, and passenger terminal services, as well as technological and ecological research, and analytical laboratory services; an… Read more
Market Cap & Net Worth: LUKA KOPER d.d. (2FA)
LUKA KOPER d.d. (F:2FA) has a market capitalization of $894.17K (€871.11K) as of March 18, 2026. Listed on the F stock exchange, this Germany-based company holds position #36458 globally and #4476 in its home market, demonstrating a 1.73% increase in market value over the past year.
Market capitalization, also known as net worth in stock markets, is calculated by multiplying LUKA KOPER d.d.'s stock price €88.00 by its total outstanding shares 9899 (9.90K).
LUKA KOPER d.d. Market Cap History: 2026 to 2026
LUKA KOPER d.d.'s market capitalization history from 2026 to 2026. Data shows growth from $894.17K to $894.17K (0.00% CAGR).
LUKA KOPER d.d. Market Cap to Earnings & Revenue Ratios Timeline
This chart shows how LUKA KOPER d.d.'s valuation ratios have evolved. The Price to Sales (P/S) ratio compares market cap to revenue, while the Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio compares market cap to net income. Lower values may indicate a more undervalued company relative to its financial performance.
Latest Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio
No P/S ratio data available
Latest Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio
No P/E ratio data available
What These Ratios Tell Investors:
- Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's sales. Lower P/S ratios may indicate undervaluation.
- Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's earnings. This is one of the most common valuation metrics.
- Trends in these ratios over time can indicate changing investor sentiment about the company's future growth prospects.
- Industry comparison provides context for whether the company is valued higher or lower than peers.
| Year | Market Cap (USD) | Revenue (USD) | Net Income (USD) | P/S Ratio | P/E Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No financial ratio data available | |||||
Competitor Companies of 2FA by Market Capitalization
Companies near LUKA KOPER d.d. in the global market cap rankings as of March 18, 2026.
Key companies related to LUKA KOPER d.d. by market ranking:
- International Container Terminal Services, Inc. (OTCGREY:ICTEY): Ranked #866 globally with a market cap of $22.80 Billion USD.
- Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Limited (NSE:ADANIPORTS): Ranked #1390 globally with a market cap of $12.97 Billion USD ( ₹1.12 Trillion INR).
- A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S (PINK:AMKBF): Ranked #1436 globally with a market cap of $12.49 Billion USD.
- SITC International Holdings Company Limited (PINK:SITIY): Ranked #1516 globally with a market cap of $11.47 Billion USD.
| Rank | Company | Symbol | Market Cap | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #866 | International Container Terminal Services, Inc. | OTCGREY:ICTEY | $22.80 Billion | $32.50 |
| #1390 | Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Limited | NSE:ADANIPORTS | $12.97 Billion | ₹1363.20 |
| #1436 | A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S | PINK:AMKBF | $12.49 Billion | $1550.00 |
| #1516 | SITC International Holdings Company Limited | PINK:SITIY | $11.47 Billion | $23.68 |
LUKA KOPER d.d. Historical Marketcap From 2026 to 2026
Between 2026 and today, LUKA KOPER d.d.'s market cap moved from $894.17K to $ 894.17K, with a yearly change of 0.00%.
| Year | Market Cap | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | €894.17K | -- |
End of Day Market Cap According to Different Sources
On Mar 18th, 2026 the market cap of LUKA KOPER d.d. was reported to be:
| Source | Market Cap |
|---|---|
| Yahoo Finance | $894.17K USD |
| MoneyControl | $894.17K USD |
| MarketWatch | $894.17K USD |
| marketcap.company | $894.17K USD |
| Reuters | $894.17K USD |
Market cap values may vary slightly between sources due to differences in calculation methods, timing, and data refresh rates.