U.S. GoldMining Inc. Warrant
U.S. GoldMining Inc., an exploration stage company, engages in the exploration and development of mineral properties in the United States. It holds interests in the Whistler project, a gold-copper exploration project covering 17,159 Ha located in the Yentna mining district, Alaska. The company was incorporated in 2015 and is based in Anchorage, Alaska. U.S. GoldMining Inc. operates as a subsidiar… Read more
Market Cap & Net Worth: U.S. GoldMining Inc. Warrant (USGOW)
U.S. GoldMining Inc. Warrant (NASDAQ:USGOW) has a market capitalization of $7.60K ($7.60K) as of March 18, 2026. Listed on the NASDAQ stock exchange, this USA-based company holds position #45418 globally and #14284 in its home market, demonstrating a -23.00% decrease in market value over the past year.
Market capitalization, also known as net worth in stock markets, is calculated by multiplying U.S. GoldMining Inc. Warrant's stock price $0.77 by its total outstanding shares 9870 (9.87K).
U.S. GoldMining Inc. Warrant Market Cap History: 2023 to 2026
U.S. GoldMining Inc. Warrant's market capitalization history from 2023 to 2026. Data shows change from $20.73K to $7.60K (-9.82% CAGR).
U.S. GoldMining Inc. Warrant Market Cap to Earnings & Revenue Ratios Timeline
This chart shows how U.S. GoldMining Inc. Warrant's valuation ratios have evolved. The Price to Sales (P/S) ratio compares market cap to revenue, while the Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio compares market cap to net income. Lower values may indicate a more undervalued company relative to its financial performance.
Latest Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio
No P/S ratio data available
Latest Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio
No P/E ratio data available
What These Ratios Tell Investors:
- Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's sales. Lower P/S ratios may indicate undervaluation.
- Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's earnings. This is one of the most common valuation metrics.
- Trends in these ratios over time can indicate changing investor sentiment about the company's future growth prospects.
- Industry comparison provides context for whether the company is valued higher or lower than peers.
| Year | Market Cap (USD) | Revenue (USD) | Net Income (USD) | P/S Ratio | P/E Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No financial ratio data available | |||||
Competitor Companies of USGOW by Market Capitalization
Companies near U.S. GoldMining Inc. Warrant in the global market cap rankings as of March 18, 2026.
Key companies related to U.S. GoldMining Inc. Warrant by market ranking:
- BHP Group Limited (NYSE:BHP): Ranked #83 globally with a market cap of $188.50 Billion USD.
- RIO Tinto Ltd (AU:RIO): Ranked #136 globally with a market cap of $137.49 Billion USD ( AU$222.06 Billion AUD).
- Rio Tinto Group (PINK:RTNTF): Ranked #208 globally with a market cap of $97.13 Billion USD.
- Glencore PLC (PINK:GLCNF): Ranked #728 globally with a market cap of $27.97 Billion USD.
| Rank | Company | Symbol | Market Cap | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #83 | BHP Group Limited | NYSE:BHP | $188.50 Billion | $70.48 |
| #136 | RIO Tinto Ltd | AU:RIO | $137.49 Billion | AU$155.18 |
| #208 | Rio Tinto Group | PINK:RTNTF | $97.13 Billion | $67.88 |
| #728 | Glencore PLC | PINK:GLCNF | $27.97 Billion | $3.02 |
U.S. GoldMining Inc. Warrant Historical Marketcap From 2023 to 2026
Between 2023 and today, U.S. GoldMining Inc. Warrant's market cap moved from $20.73K to $ 7.60K, with a yearly change of -9.82%.
| Year | Market Cap | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $7.60K | +15.10% |
| 2025 | $6.60K | -62.20% |
| 2024 | $17.47K | -15.71% |
| 2023 | $20.73K | -- |
End of Day Market Cap According to Different Sources
On Mar 18th, 2026 the market cap of U.S. GoldMining Inc. Warrant was reported to be:
| Source | Market Cap |
|---|---|
| Yahoo Finance | $7.60K USD |
| MoneyControl | $7.60K USD |
| MarketWatch | $7.60K USD |
| marketcap.company | $7.60K USD |
| Reuters | $7.60K USD |
Market cap values may vary slightly between sources due to differences in calculation methods, timing, and data refresh rates.