Empire Metals Limited

OTCQB:EPMLF USA
Market Cap
$1.30K
Market Cap Rank
#18898 Global
#6976 in USA
Share Price
$0.14
Change (1 day)
-7.07%
52-Week Range
$0.14 - $0.17
All Time High
$0.17
About

Empire Metals Limited engages in the exploration and development of properties in the United Kingdom, Australia, and Austria. The company explores for copper, lithium, gold, titanium, and other minerals. Its flagship project is the Pitfield project that includes four exploration tenements covering an area of 1,042 square kilometers located in Western Australia. The company was formerly known as G… Read more

Market Cap & Net Worth: Empire Metals Limited (EPMLF)

Empire Metals Limited (OTCQB:EPMLF) has a market capitalization of $1.30K ($1.30K) as of March 19, 2026. Listed on the OTCQB stock exchange, this USA-based company holds position #18898 globally and #6976 in its home market, demonstrating a 0.00% increase in market value over the past year.

Market capitalization, also known as net worth in stock markets, is calculated by multiplying Empire Metals Limited's stock price $0.14 by its total outstanding shares 9272 (9.27K).

Empire Metals Limited Market Cap History: 2025 to 2025

Empire Metals Limited's market capitalization history from 2025 to 2025. Data shows growth from $1.30K to $1.30K (0.00% CAGR).

Empire Metals Limited Market Cap to Earnings & Revenue Ratios Timeline

This chart shows how Empire Metals Limited's valuation ratios have evolved. The Price to Sales (P/S) ratio compares market cap to revenue, while the Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio compares market cap to net income. Lower values may indicate a more undervalued company relative to its financial performance.

Latest Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio

No P/S ratio data available

Latest Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio

No P/E ratio data available

What These Ratios Tell Investors:
  • Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's sales. Lower P/S ratios may indicate undervaluation.
  • Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's earnings. This is one of the most common valuation metrics.
  • Trends in these ratios over time can indicate changing investor sentiment about the company's future growth prospects.
  • Industry comparison provides context for whether the company is valued higher or lower than peers.
Year Market Cap (USD) Revenue (USD) Net Income (USD) P/S Ratio P/E Ratio
No financial ratio data available

Competitor Companies of EPMLF by Market Capitalization

Companies near Empire Metals Limited in the global market cap rankings as of March 19, 2026.

Key companies related to Empire Metals Limited by market ranking:

  • Arise AB (publ) (F:A4W): Ranked #18889 globally with a market cap of $85.56 Million USD ( €83.36 Million EUR).
  • ECIT AS NK 1 (F:3CZ): Ranked #18890 globally with a market cap of $85.56 Million USD ( €83.35 Million EUR).
  • De Licacy Industrial Co Ltd (TW:1464): Ranked #18899 globally with a market cap of $85.39 Million USD ( NT$2.83 Billion TWD).
  • Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Limited (NSE:GUJALKALI): Ranked #18900 globally with a market cap of $85.32 Million USD ( ₹7.39 Billion INR).

Market capitalization comparison (in billions USD)
Rank Company Symbol Market Cap Price
#18889 Arise AB (publ) F:A4W $85.56 Million €4.19
#18890 ECIT AS NK 1 F:3CZ $85.56 Million €0.61
#18899 De Licacy Industrial Co Ltd TW:1464 $85.39 Million NT$10.75
#18900 Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Limited NSE:GUJALKALI $85.32 Million ₹432.10

Empire Metals Limited Historical Marketcap From 2025 to 2025

Between 2025 and today, Empire Metals Limited's market cap moved from $1.30K to $ 1.30K, with a yearly change of 0.00%.

Year Market Cap Change (%)
2025 $1.30K --

End of Day Market Cap According to Different Sources

On Mar 19th, 2026 the market cap of Empire Metals Limited was reported to be:

Source Market Cap
Yahoo Finance $1.30K USD
MoneyControl $1.30K USD
MarketWatch $1.30K USD
marketcap.company $1.30K USD
Reuters $1.30K USD

Market cap values may vary slightly between sources due to differences in calculation methods, timing, and data refresh rates.