NatBridge Resources Ltd.
NatBridge Resources Ltd. engages in the acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral properties in Canada. The company has an option agreement to acquire 100% interest in the LeMare property that comprises 12 mineral claims located in British Columbia, as well as a mineral rights package that includes three patented claims consisting of NI 43-101 inferred gold resources. The company was f… Read more
Market Cap & Net Worth: NatBridge Resources Ltd. (GEGCF)
NatBridge Resources Ltd. (PINK:GEGCF) has a market capitalization of $8.63 Million ($8.63 Million) as of March 19, 2026. Listed on the PINK stock exchange, this USA-based company holds position #47619 globally and #14703 in its home market, demonstrating a 0.00% increase in market value over the past year.
Market capitalization, also known as net worth in stock markets, is calculated by multiplying NatBridge Resources Ltd.'s stock price $0.17 by its total outstanding shares 50756800 (50.76 Million).
NatBridge Resources Ltd. Market Cap History: 2024 to 2025
NatBridge Resources Ltd.'s market capitalization history from 2024 to 2025. Data shows growth from $9.14 Million to $8.63 Million (0.00% CAGR).
NatBridge Resources Ltd. Market Cap to Earnings & Revenue Ratios Timeline
This chart shows how NatBridge Resources Ltd.'s valuation ratios have evolved. The Price to Sales (P/S) ratio compares market cap to revenue, while the Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio compares market cap to net income. Lower values may indicate a more undervalued company relative to its financial performance.
Latest Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio
No P/S ratio data available
Latest Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio
No P/E ratio data available
What These Ratios Tell Investors:
- Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's sales. Lower P/S ratios may indicate undervaluation.
- Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's earnings. This is one of the most common valuation metrics.
- Trends in these ratios over time can indicate changing investor sentiment about the company's future growth prospects.
- Industry comparison provides context for whether the company is valued higher or lower than peers.
| Year | Market Cap (USD) | Revenue (USD) | Net Income (USD) | P/S Ratio | P/E Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No financial ratio data available | |||||
Competitor Companies of GEGCF by Market Capitalization
Companies near NatBridge Resources Ltd. in the global market cap rankings as of March 19, 2026.
Key companies related to NatBridge Resources Ltd. by market ranking:
- BHP Group Limited (NYSE:BHP): Ranked #83 globally with a market cap of $188.50 Billion USD.
- RIO Tinto Ltd (AU:RIO): Ranked #136 globally with a market cap of $137.49 Billion USD ( AU$222.06 Billion AUD).
- Rio Tinto Group (PINK:RTNTF): Ranked #208 globally with a market cap of $97.13 Billion USD.
- Glencore PLC (PINK:GLCNF): Ranked #728 globally with a market cap of $27.97 Billion USD.
| Rank | Company | Symbol | Market Cap | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #83 | BHP Group Limited | NYSE:BHP | $188.50 Billion | $70.48 |
| #136 | RIO Tinto Ltd | AU:RIO | $137.49 Billion | AU$155.18 |
| #208 | Rio Tinto Group | PINK:RTNTF | $97.13 Billion | $67.88 |
| #728 | Glencore PLC | PINK:GLCNF | $27.97 Billion | $3.02 |
NatBridge Resources Ltd. Historical Marketcap From 2024 to 2025
Between 2024 and today, NatBridge Resources Ltd.'s market cap moved from $9.14 Million to $ 8.63 Million, with a yearly change of 0.00%.
| Year | Market Cap | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $8.63 Million | -5.56% |
| 2024 | $9.14 Million | -- |
End of Day Market Cap According to Different Sources
On Mar 18th, 2026 the market cap of NatBridge Resources Ltd. was reported to be:
| Source | Market Cap |
|---|---|
| Yahoo Finance | $8.63 Million USD |
| MoneyControl | $8.63 Million USD |
| MarketWatch | $8.63 Million USD |
| marketcap.company | $8.63 Million USD |
| Reuters | $8.63 Million USD |
Market cap values may vary slightly between sources due to differences in calculation methods, timing, and data refresh rates.