Juno Minerals Ltd
Juno Minerals Limited, an independent mining company, engages in the evaluation and development of mineral properties in Australia. The company explores for iron ore and lithium deposits. It holds interests in the Central Yilgarn Iron Project comprising the Mount Mason DSO hematite and Mount Ida magnetite projects covering approximately 490 square kilometers located near the northwest of the town… Read more
Market Cap & Net Worth: Juno Minerals Ltd (JNOMF)
Juno Minerals Ltd (PINK:JNOMF) has a market capitalization of $2.30 Million ($2.30 Million) as of March 19, 2026. Listed on the PINK stock exchange, this USA-based company holds position #36943 globally and #12015 in its home market, demonstrating a 0.00% increase in market value over the past year.
Market capitalization, also known as net worth in stock markets, is calculated by multiplying Juno Minerals Ltd's stock price $0.01 by its total outstanding shares 209237049 (209.24 Million).
Juno Minerals Ltd Market Cap History: 2021 to 2025
Juno Minerals Ltd's market capitalization history from 2021 to 2025. Data shows change from $20.92 Million to $2.30 Million (-46.53% CAGR).
Juno Minerals Ltd Market Cap to Earnings & Revenue Ratios Timeline
This chart shows how Juno Minerals Ltd's valuation ratios have evolved. The Price to Sales (P/S) ratio compares market cap to revenue, while the Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio compares market cap to net income. Lower values may indicate a more undervalued company relative to its financial performance.
Latest Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio
No P/S ratio data available
Latest Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio
No P/E ratio data available
What These Ratios Tell Investors:
- Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's sales. Lower P/S ratios may indicate undervaluation.
- Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's earnings. This is one of the most common valuation metrics.
- Trends in these ratios over time can indicate changing investor sentiment about the company's future growth prospects.
- Industry comparison provides context for whether the company is valued higher or lower than peers.
| Year | Market Cap (USD) | Revenue (USD) | Net Income (USD) | P/S Ratio | P/E Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No financial ratio data available | |||||
Competitor Companies of JNOMF by Market Capitalization
Companies near Juno Minerals Ltd in the global market cap rankings as of March 19, 2026.
Key companies related to Juno Minerals Ltd by market ranking:
- BHP Group Limited (NYSE:BHP): Ranked #83 globally with a market cap of $188.50 Billion USD.
- RIO Tinto Ltd (AU:RIO): Ranked #136 globally with a market cap of $137.49 Billion USD ( AU$222.06 Billion AUD).
- Rio Tinto Group (PINK:RTNTF): Ranked #208 globally with a market cap of $97.13 Billion USD.
- Glencore PLC (PINK:GLCNF): Ranked #728 globally with a market cap of $27.97 Billion USD.
| Rank | Company | Symbol | Market Cap | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #83 | BHP Group Limited | NYSE:BHP | $188.50 Billion | $70.48 |
| #136 | RIO Tinto Ltd | AU:RIO | $137.49 Billion | AU$155.18 |
| #208 | Rio Tinto Group | PINK:RTNTF | $97.13 Billion | $67.88 |
| #728 | Glencore PLC | PINK:GLCNF | $27.97 Billion | $3.02 |
Juno Minerals Ltd Historical Marketcap From 2021 to 2025
Between 2021 and today, Juno Minerals Ltd's market cap moved from $20.92 Million to $ 2.30 Million, with a yearly change of -46.53%.
| Year | Market Cap | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $2.30 Million | -26.67% |
| 2024 | $3.14 Million | -77.61% |
| 2023 | $14.02 Million | +24.07% |
| 2022 | $11.30 Million | -46.00% |
| 2021 | $20.92 Million | -- |
End of Day Market Cap According to Different Sources
On Mar 18th, 2026 the market cap of Juno Minerals Ltd was reported to be:
| Source | Market Cap |
|---|---|
| Yahoo Finance | $2.30 Million USD |
| MoneyControl | $2.30 Million USD |
| MarketWatch | $2.30 Million USD |
| marketcap.company | $2.30 Million USD |
| Reuters | $2.30 Million USD |
Market cap values may vary slightly between sources due to differences in calculation methods, timing, and data refresh rates.