Louisiana Central Oil & Gas Co
No Description Available
Market Cap & Net Worth: Louisiana Central Oil & Gas Co (LCNTU)
Louisiana Central Oil & Gas Co (PINK:LCNTU) has a market capitalization of $7.67 Million ($7.67 Million) as of March 19, 2026. Listed on the PINK stock exchange, this USA-based company holds position #31359 globally and #10320 in its home market, demonstrating a 0.00% increase in market value over the past year.
Market capitalization, also known as net worth in stock markets, is calculated by multiplying Louisiana Central Oil & Gas Co's stock price $511.00 by its total outstanding shares 15000 (15.00K).
Louisiana Central Oil & Gas Co Market Cap History: 2015 to 2025
Louisiana Central Oil & Gas Co's market capitalization history from 2015 to 2025. Data shows change from $12.22 Million to $7.67 Million (-5.13% CAGR).
Louisiana Central Oil & Gas Co Market Cap to Earnings & Revenue Ratios Timeline
This chart shows how Louisiana Central Oil & Gas Co's valuation ratios have evolved. The Price to Sales (P/S) ratio compares market cap to revenue, while the Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio compares market cap to net income. Lower values may indicate a more undervalued company relative to its financial performance.
Latest Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio
No P/S ratio data available
Latest Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio
No P/E ratio data available
What These Ratios Tell Investors:
- Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's sales. Lower P/S ratios may indicate undervaluation.
- Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's earnings. This is one of the most common valuation metrics.
- Trends in these ratios over time can indicate changing investor sentiment about the company's future growth prospects.
- Industry comparison provides context for whether the company is valued higher or lower than peers.
| Year | Market Cap (USD) | Revenue (USD) | Net Income (USD) | P/S Ratio | P/E Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No financial ratio data available | |||||
Competitor Companies of LCNTU by Market Capitalization
Companies near Louisiana Central Oil & Gas Co in the global market cap rankings as of March 19, 2026.
Key companies related to Louisiana Central Oil & Gas Co by market ranking:
- Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX): Ranked #335 globally with a market cap of $64.57 Billion USD.
- Valero Energy Corporation (NYSE:VLO): Ranked #350 globally with a market cap of $62.18 Billion USD.
- Marathon Petroleum Corp (NYSE:MPC): Ranked #360 globally with a market cap of $61.10 Billion USD.
- ENEOS Holdings Inc (PINK:JXHGF): Ranked #1335 globally with a market cap of $13.45 Billion USD.
| Rank | Company | Symbol | Market Cap | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #335 | Phillips 66 | NYSE:PSX | $64.57 Billion | $172.74 |
| #350 | Valero Energy Corporation | NYSE:VLO | $62.18 Billion | $238.46 |
| #360 | Marathon Petroleum Corp | NYSE:MPC | $61.10 Billion | $236.24 |
| #1335 | ENEOS Holdings Inc | PINK:JXHGF | $13.45 Billion | $5.00 |
Louisiana Central Oil & Gas Co Historical Marketcap From 2015 to 2025
Between 2015 and today, Louisiana Central Oil & Gas Co's market cap moved from $12.22 Million to $ 7.67 Million, with a yearly change of -5.13%.
| Year | Market Cap | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $7.67 Million | +0.20% |
| 2024 | $7.65 Million | -7.27% |
| 2023 | $8.25 Million | +5.77% |
| 2022 | $7.80 Million | +14.20% |
| 2021 | $6.83 Million | -24.11% |
| 2020 | $9.00 Million | -33.48% |
| 2019 | $13.53 Million | -5.55% |
| 2018 | $14.32 Million | +26.49% |
| 2017 | $11.32 Million | -5.62% |
| 2016 | $12.00 Million | -1.83% |
| 2015 | $12.22 Million | -- |
End of Day Market Cap According to Different Sources
On Mar 19th, 2026 the market cap of Louisiana Central Oil & Gas Co was reported to be:
| Source | Market Cap |
|---|---|
| Yahoo Finance | $7.67 Million USD |
| MoneyControl | $7.67 Million USD |
| MarketWatch | $7.67 Million USD |
| marketcap.company | $7.67 Million USD |
| Reuters | $7.67 Million USD |
Market cap values may vary slightly between sources due to differences in calculation methods, timing, and data refresh rates.