Liquid Holdings Group Inc
Liquid Holdings Group, Inc. is in the process of liquidation of its assets. Previously, it was engaged in the provision of cloud-based trading and portfolio management solutions. The company was founded in 2012 and is based in Hoboken, New Jersey.
Market Cap & Net Worth: Liquid Holdings Group Inc (LIQDQ)
Liquid Holdings Group Inc (PINK:LIQDQ) has a market capitalization of $6.03K ($6.03K) as of March 18, 2026. Listed on the PINK stock exchange, this USA-based company holds position #51162 globally and #15878 in its home market, demonstrating a 0.00% increase in market value over the past year.
Market capitalization, also known as net worth in stock markets, is calculated by multiplying Liquid Holdings Group Inc's stock price $0.00 by its total outstanding shares 60332375 (60.33 Million).
Liquid Holdings Group Inc Market Cap History: 2015 to 2025
Liquid Holdings Group Inc's market capitalization history from 2015 to 2025. Data shows change from $663.66K to $6.03K (-50.32% CAGR).
Liquid Holdings Group Inc Market Cap to Earnings & Revenue Ratios Timeline
This chart shows how Liquid Holdings Group Inc's valuation ratios have evolved. The Price to Sales (P/S) ratio compares market cap to revenue, while the Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio compares market cap to net income. Lower values may indicate a more undervalued company relative to its financial performance.
Latest Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio
No P/S ratio data available
Latest Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio
No P/E ratio data available
What These Ratios Tell Investors:
- Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's sales. Lower P/S ratios may indicate undervaluation.
- Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's earnings. This is one of the most common valuation metrics.
- Trends in these ratios over time can indicate changing investor sentiment about the company's future growth prospects.
- Industry comparison provides context for whether the company is valued higher or lower than peers.
| Year | Market Cap (USD) | Revenue (USD) | Net Income (USD) | P/S Ratio | P/E Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No financial ratio data available | |||||
Competitor Companies of LIQDQ by Market Capitalization
Companies near Liquid Holdings Group Inc in the global market cap rankings as of March 18, 2026.
Key companies related to Liquid Holdings Group Inc by market ranking:
- SAP SE (PINK:SAPGF): Ranked #61 globally with a market cap of $238.59 Billion USD.
- Shopify Inc (NYSE:SHOP): Ranked #75 globally with a market cap of $196.50 Billion USD.
- Salesforce.com Inc (NYSE:CRM): Ranked #86 globally with a market cap of $180.61 Billion USD.
- Uber Technologies Inc (NYSE:UBER): Ranked #118 globally with a market cap of $150.35 Billion USD.
| Rank | Company | Symbol | Market Cap | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #61 | SAP SE | PINK:SAPGF | $238.59 Billion | $246.20 |
| #75 | Shopify Inc | NYSE:SHOP | $196.50 Billion | $161.08 |
| #86 | Salesforce.com Inc | NYSE:CRM | $180.61 Billion | $198.34 |
| #118 | Uber Technologies Inc | NYSE:UBER | $150.35 Billion | $74.66 |
Liquid Holdings Group Inc Historical Marketcap From 2015 to 2025
Between 2015 and today, Liquid Holdings Group Inc's market cap moved from $663.66K to $ 6.03K, with a yearly change of -50.32%.
| Year | Market Cap | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $6.03K | 0.00% |
| 2024 | $6.03K | 0.00% |
| 2023 | $6.03K | 0.00% |
| 2022 | $6.03K | -92.86% |
| 2021 | $84.47K | -44.00% |
| 2020 | $150.83K | +66.67% |
| 2019 | $90.50K | +25.00% |
| 2018 | $72.40K | +140.00% |
| 2017 | $30.17K | -44.44% |
| 2016 | $54.30K | -91.82% |
| 2015 | $663.66K | -- |
End of Day Market Cap According to Different Sources
On Mar 17th, 2026 the market cap of Liquid Holdings Group Inc was reported to be:
| Source | Market Cap |
|---|---|
| Yahoo Finance | $6.03K USD |
| MoneyControl | $6.03K USD |
| MarketWatch | $6.03K USD |
| marketcap.company | $6.03K USD |
| Reuters | $6.03K USD |
Market cap values may vary slightly between sources due to differences in calculation methods, timing, and data refresh rates.