LOUD Technologies Inc
LOUD Technologies Inc. engineers, markets, and distributes a range of professional audio and musical instrument products worldwide. LOUD Technologies Inc. was formerly known as Mackie Designs, Inc. and changed its name to LOUD Technologies Inc. in September 2003. The company was founded in 1988 and is based in Woodinville, Washington.
Market Cap & Net Worth: LOUD Technologies Inc (LTEC)
LOUD Technologies Inc (PINK:LTEC) has a market capitalization of $0.93 ($0.93) as of March 18, 2026. Listed on the PINK stock exchange, this USA-based company holds position #51409 globally and #16090 in its home market, demonstrating a 0.00% increase in market value over the past year.
Market capitalization, also known as net worth in stock markets, is calculated by multiplying LOUD Technologies Inc's stock price $0.00 by its total outstanding shares 9324 (9.32K).
LOUD Technologies Inc Market Cap History: 2015 to 2025
LOUD Technologies Inc's market capitalization history from 2015 to 2025. Data shows change from $466.20 to $0.93 (-48.21% CAGR).
LOUD Technologies Inc Market Cap to Earnings & Revenue Ratios Timeline
This chart shows how LOUD Technologies Inc's valuation ratios have evolved. The Price to Sales (P/S) ratio compares market cap to revenue, while the Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio compares market cap to net income. Lower values may indicate a more undervalued company relative to its financial performance.
Latest Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio
No P/S ratio data available
Latest Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio
No P/E ratio data available
What These Ratios Tell Investors:
- Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's sales. Lower P/S ratios may indicate undervaluation.
- Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's earnings. This is one of the most common valuation metrics.
- Trends in these ratios over time can indicate changing investor sentiment about the company's future growth prospects.
- Industry comparison provides context for whether the company is valued higher or lower than peers.
| Year | Market Cap (USD) | Revenue (USD) | Net Income (USD) | P/S Ratio | P/E Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No financial ratio data available | |||||
Competitor Companies of LTEC by Market Capitalization
Companies near LOUD Technologies Inc in the global market cap rankings as of March 18, 2026.
Key companies related to LOUD Technologies Inc by market ranking:
- Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL): Ranked #2 globally with a market cap of $3.73 Trillion USD.
- Samsung Electronics Co Ltd (PINK:SSNLF): Ranked #67 globally with a market cap of $226.94 Billion USD.
- Sony Corp (PINK:SNEJF): Ranked #142 globally with a market cap of $131.42 Billion USD.
- Xiaomi Corp (PINK:XIACF): Ranked #212 globally with a market cap of $95.43 Billion USD.
| Rank | Company | Symbol | Market Cap | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #2 | Apple Inc | NASDAQ:AAPL | $3.73 Trillion | $254.23 |
| #67 | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd | PINK:SSNLF | $226.94 Billion | $40.60 |
| #142 | Sony Corp | PINK:SNEJF | $131.42 Billion | $22.03 |
| #212 | Xiaomi Corp | PINK:XIACF | $95.43 Billion | $5.49 |
LOUD Technologies Inc Historical Marketcap From 2015 to 2025
Between 2015 and today, LOUD Technologies Inc's market cap moved from $466.20 to $ 0.93, with a yearly change of -48.21%.
| Year | Market Cap | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $0.93 | 0.00% |
| 2024 | $0.93 | 0.00% |
| 2023 | $0.93 | 0.00% |
| 2022 | $0.93 | -80.00% |
| 2021 | $4.66 | -95.00% |
| 2020 | $93.24 | -33.33% |
| 2019 | $139.86 | -25.00% |
| 2018 | $186.48 | -60.00% |
| 2017 | $466.20 | -16.67% |
| 2016 | $559.44 | +20.00% |
| 2015 | $466.20 | -- |
End of Day Market Cap According to Different Sources
On Mar 18th, 2026 the market cap of LOUD Technologies Inc was reported to be:
| Source | Market Cap |
|---|---|
| Yahoo Finance | $0.93 USD |
| MoneyControl | $0.93 USD |
| MarketWatch | $0.93 USD |
| marketcap.company | $0.93 USD |
| Reuters | $0.93 USD |
Market cap values may vary slightly between sources due to differences in calculation methods, timing, and data refresh rates.