NOA Lithium Brines Inc.
NOA Lithium Brines Inc. engages in exploration and evaluation of mining assets in Argentina. The company explores for lithium deposits. Its flagship property is the 100% owned Rio Grande project, which covers an area of approximately 37,000 hectares of claims located at the Rio Grande Salar in the Salta Province. NOA Lithium Brines Inc. is based in Toronto, Canada.
Market Cap & Net Worth: NOA Lithium Brines Inc. (NLIBF)
NOA Lithium Brines Inc. (PINK:NLIBF) has a market capitalization of $59.18 Million ($59.18 Million) as of March 19, 2026. Listed on the PINK stock exchange, this USA-based company holds position #24301 globally and #8415 in its home market, demonstrating a -11.20% decrease in market value over the past year.
Market capitalization, also known as net worth in stock markets, is calculated by multiplying NOA Lithium Brines Inc.'s stock price $0.23 by its total outstanding shares 257318451 (257.32 Million).
NOA Lithium Brines Inc. Market Cap History: 2023 to 2025
NOA Lithium Brines Inc.'s market capitalization history from 2023 to 2025. Data shows change from $87.57 Million to $59.18 Million (-24.02% CAGR).
NOA Lithium Brines Inc. Market Cap to Earnings & Revenue Ratios Timeline
This chart shows how NOA Lithium Brines Inc.'s valuation ratios have evolved. The Price to Sales (P/S) ratio compares market cap to revenue, while the Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio compares market cap to net income. Lower values may indicate a more undervalued company relative to its financial performance.
Latest Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio
No P/S ratio data available
Latest Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio
No P/E ratio data available
What These Ratios Tell Investors:
- Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's sales. Lower P/S ratios may indicate undervaluation.
- Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's earnings. This is one of the most common valuation metrics.
- Trends in these ratios over time can indicate changing investor sentiment about the company's future growth prospects.
- Industry comparison provides context for whether the company is valued higher or lower than peers.
| Year | Market Cap (USD) | Revenue (USD) | Net Income (USD) | P/S Ratio | P/E Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No financial ratio data available | |||||
Competitor Companies of NLIBF by Market Capitalization
Companies near NOA Lithium Brines Inc. in the global market cap rankings as of March 19, 2026.
Key companies related to NOA Lithium Brines Inc. by market ranking:
- BHP Group Limited (NYSE:BHP): Ranked #83 globally with a market cap of $188.50 Billion USD.
- RIO Tinto Ltd (AU:RIO): Ranked #136 globally with a market cap of $137.49 Billion USD ( AU$222.06 Billion AUD).
- Rio Tinto Group (PINK:RTNTF): Ranked #208 globally with a market cap of $97.13 Billion USD.
- Glencore PLC (PINK:GLCNF): Ranked #728 globally with a market cap of $27.97 Billion USD.
| Rank | Company | Symbol | Market Cap | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #83 | BHP Group Limited | NYSE:BHP | $188.50 Billion | $70.48 |
| #136 | RIO Tinto Ltd | AU:RIO | $137.49 Billion | AU$155.18 |
| #208 | Rio Tinto Group | PINK:RTNTF | $97.13 Billion | $67.88 |
| #728 | Glencore PLC | PINK:GLCNF | $27.97 Billion | $3.02 |
NOA Lithium Brines Inc. Historical Marketcap From 2023 to 2025
Between 2023 and today, NOA Lithium Brines Inc.'s market cap moved from $87.57 Million to $ 59.18 Million, with a yearly change of -24.02%.
| Year | Market Cap | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $59.18 Million | +109.09% |
| 2024 | $28.31 Million | -67.68% |
| 2023 | $87.57 Million | -- |
End of Day Market Cap According to Different Sources
On Mar 18th, 2026 the market cap of NOA Lithium Brines Inc. was reported to be:
| Source | Market Cap |
|---|---|
| Yahoo Finance | $59.18 Million USD |
| MoneyControl | $59.18 Million USD |
| MarketWatch | $59.18 Million USD |
| marketcap.company | $59.18 Million USD |
| Reuters | $59.18 Million USD |
Market cap values may vary slightly between sources due to differences in calculation methods, timing, and data refresh rates.