BIPROGY Inc.
BIPROGY Inc. provides cloud computing and outsourcing services in Japan. It also engages in the sale/rental of computer and network system; development and sale of software; and provision of system related services. In addition, the company provides digital transformation, workstyle reforms, artificial intelligence, robot deployment, blockchain, IoT, service design, agile development and support,… Read more
Market Cap & Net Worth: BIPROGY Inc. (NTULF)
BIPROGY Inc. (PINK:NTULF) has a market capitalization of $2.79 Billion ($2.79 Billion) as of March 18, 2026. Listed on the PINK stock exchange, this USA-based company holds position #4781 globally and #2942 in its home market, demonstrating a 0.00% increase in market value over the past year.
Market capitalization, also known as net worth in stock markets, is calculated by multiplying BIPROGY Inc.'s stock price $28.91 by its total outstanding shares 96563216 (96.56 Million).
BIPROGY Inc. Market Cap History: 2025 to 2025
BIPROGY Inc.'s market capitalization history from 2025 to 2025. Data shows growth from $2.79 Billion to $2.79 Billion (0.00% CAGR).
BIPROGY Inc. Market Cap to Earnings & Revenue Ratios Timeline
This chart shows how BIPROGY Inc.'s valuation ratios have evolved. The Price to Sales (P/S) ratio compares market cap to revenue, while the Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio compares market cap to net income. Lower values may indicate a more undervalued company relative to its financial performance.
Latest Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio
0.01x
BIPROGY Inc.'s market cap is 0.01 times its annual revenue
0.28x
Lower than industry averageLatest Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio
0.10x
BIPROGY Inc.'s market cap is 0.10 times its annual earnings
8.54x
Lower than industry averageWhat These Ratios Tell Investors:
- Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's sales. Lower P/S ratios may indicate undervaluation.
- Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's earnings. This is one of the most common valuation metrics.
- Trends in these ratios over time can indicate changing investor sentiment about the company's future growth prospects.
- Industry comparison provides context for whether the company is valued higher or lower than peers.
| Year | Market Cap (USD) | Revenue (USD) | Net Income (USD) | P/S Ratio | P/E Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $2.79 Billion | $404.01 Billion | $26.96 Billion | 0.01x | 0.10x |
Competitor Companies of NTULF by Market Capitalization
Companies near BIPROGY Inc. in the global market cap rankings as of March 18, 2026.
Key companies related to BIPROGY Inc. by market ranking:
- International Business Machines (NYSE:IBM): Ranked #63 globally with a market cap of $232.33 Billion USD.
- Accenture plc (NYSE:ACN): Ranked #152 globally with a market cap of $121.95 Billion USD.
- Infosys Limited (F:IOY): Ranked #521 globally with a market cap of $40.83 Billion USD ( €39.78 Billion EUR).
- Fiserv Inc. (NASDAQ:FISV): Ranked #594 globally with a market cap of $35.73 Billion USD.
| Rank | Company | Symbol | Market Cap | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #63 | International Business Machines | NYSE:IBM | $232.33 Billion | $256.11 |
| #152 | Accenture plc | NYSE:ACN | $121.95 Billion | $198.66 |
| #521 | Infosys Limited | F:IOY | $40.83 Billion | €11.55 |
| #594 | Fiserv Inc. | NASDAQ:FISV | $35.73 Billion | $58.21 |
BIPROGY Inc. Historical Marketcap From 2025 to 2025
Between 2025 and today, BIPROGY Inc.'s market cap moved from $2.79 Billion to $ 2.79 Billion, with a yearly change of 0.00%.
| Year | Market Cap | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $2.79 Billion | -- |
End of Day Market Cap According to Different Sources
On Mar 18th, 2026 the market cap of BIPROGY Inc. was reported to be:
| Source | Market Cap |
|---|---|
| Yahoo Finance | $2.79 Billion USD |
| MoneyControl | $2.79 Billion USD |
| MarketWatch | $2.79 Billion USD |
| marketcap.company | $2.79 Billion USD |
| Reuters | $2.79 Billion USD |
Market cap values may vary slightly between sources due to differences in calculation methods, timing, and data refresh rates.