CONSTANCE HOTELS SERVICES LTD
CONSTANCE HOTELS SERVICES LTD operates in various business sectors.
Market Cap & Net Worth: CONSTANCE HOTELS SERVICES LTD (CHSL)
CONSTANCE HOTELS SERVICES LTD (SEM:CHSL) has a market capitalization of $2.58K (MURs121.63K) as of March 18, 2026. Listed on the SEM stock exchange, this Mauritius-based company holds position #46873 globally and #46 in its home market, demonstrating a 0.00% increase in market value over the past year.
Market capitalization, also known as net worth in stock markets, is calculated by multiplying CONSTANCE HOTELS SERVICES LTD's stock price MURs13.00 by its total outstanding shares 9356 (9.36K).
CONSTANCE HOTELS SERVICES LTD Market Cap History: 2015 to 2026
CONSTANCE HOTELS SERVICES LTD's market capitalization history from 2015 to 2026. Data shows change from $6.93K to $2.58K (-9.32% CAGR).
CONSTANCE HOTELS SERVICES LTD Market Cap to Earnings & Revenue Ratios Timeline
This chart shows how CONSTANCE HOTELS SERVICES LTD's valuation ratios have evolved. The Price to Sales (P/S) ratio compares market cap to revenue, while the Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio compares market cap to net income. Lower values may indicate a more undervalued company relative to its financial performance.
Latest Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio
No P/S ratio data available
Latest Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio
No P/E ratio data available
What These Ratios Tell Investors:
- Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's sales. Lower P/S ratios may indicate undervaluation.
- Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's earnings. This is one of the most common valuation metrics.
- Trends in these ratios over time can indicate changing investor sentiment about the company's future growth prospects.
- Industry comparison provides context for whether the company is valued higher or lower than peers.
| Year | Market Cap (USD) | Revenue (USD) | Net Income (USD) | P/S Ratio | P/E Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No financial ratio data available | |||||
Competitor Companies of CHSL by Market Capitalization
Companies near CONSTANCE HOTELS SERVICES LTD in the global market cap rankings as of March 18, 2026.
Key companies related to CONSTANCE HOTELS SERVICES LTD by market ranking:
- New Providence Acquisition Corp. III Warrants (NASDAQ:NPACW): Ranked #46864 globally with a market cap of $2.76K USD.
- Bogala Graphite Lanka PLC (CM:BOGAN0000): Ranked #46865 globally with a market cap of $2.76K USD ( SLRs803.64K LKR).
- Duality SA (WAR:DUA): Ranked #46874 globally with a market cap of $2.74K USD ( zł11.38K PLN).
- Gen 2 Technologies Inc (PINK:MNIZ): Ranked #46875 globally with a market cap of $2.73K USD.
| Rank | Company | Symbol | Market Cap | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #46864 | New Providence Acquisition Corp. III Warrants | NASDAQ:NPACW | $2.76K | $0.30 |
| #46865 | Bogala Graphite Lanka PLC | CM:BOGAN0000 | $2.76K | SLRs87.20 |
| #46874 | Duality SA | WAR:DUA | $2.74K | zł1.25 |
| #46875 | Gen 2 Technologies Inc | PINK:MNIZ | $2.73K | $0.28 |
CONSTANCE HOTELS SERVICES LTD Historical Marketcap From 2015 to 2026
Between 2015 and today, CONSTANCE HOTELS SERVICES LTD's market cap moved from $6.93K to $ 2.58K, with a yearly change of -9.32%.
| Year | Market Cap | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | MURs2.58K | -8.77% |
| 2025 | MURs2.83K | -25.00% |
| 2024 | MURs3.77K | -7.32% |
| 2023 | MURs4.07K | +0.99% |
| 2022 | MURs4.03K | -1.93% |
| 2021 | MURs4.11K | +56.82% |
| 2020 | MURs2.62K | -48.74% |
| 2019 | MURs5.11K | -12.71% |
| 2018 | MURs5.86K | -7.96% |
| 2017 | MURs6.36K | -3.90% |
| 2016 | MURs6.62K | -4.44% |
| 2015 | MURs6.93K | -- |
End of Day Market Cap According to Different Sources
On Mar 18th, 2026 the market cap of CONSTANCE HOTELS SERVICES LTD was reported to be:
| Source | Market Cap |
|---|---|
| Yahoo Finance | $2.58K USD |
| MoneyControl | $2.58K USD |
| MarketWatch | $2.58K USD |
| marketcap.company | $2.58K USD |
| Reuters | $2.58K USD |
Market cap values may vary slightly between sources due to differences in calculation methods, timing, and data refresh rates.