China Citic Bank Corp Ltd Class A
China CITIC Bank Corporation Limited provides various banking products and services in the People's Republic of China and internationally. It operates in three segments: Corporate Banking, Retail Banking, and Financial Market business. The Corporate Banking segment offers corporate loans, deposit services, agency services, remittance and settlement services, and guarantee services. The Retail Ban… Read more
Market Cap & Net Worth: China Citic Bank Corp Ltd Class A (601998)
China Citic Bank Corp Ltd Class A (SHG:601998) has a market capitalization of $41.72 Billion (CN¥306.13 Billion) as of March 18, 2026. Listed on the SHG stock exchange, this China-based company holds position #1318 globally and #49 in its home market, demonstrating a 4.02% increase in market value over the past year.
Market capitalization, also known as net worth in stock markets, is calculated by multiplying China Citic Bank Corp Ltd Class A's stock price CN¥7.51 by its total outstanding shares 40762999287 (40.76 Billion).
China Citic Bank Corp Ltd Class A Market Cap History: 2015 to 2026
China Citic Bank Corp Ltd Class A's market capitalization history from 2015 to 2026. Data shows growth from $27.82 Billion to $41.72 Billion (5.33% CAGR).
Index Memberships
China Citic Bank Corp Ltd Class A is a constituent of 2 market indices:
| Index | Total Market Cap | Weight (%) | Rank by Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Shanghai Shenzhen CSI 300
CSI300
|
$1.21 Trillion | 1.14% | #18 of 285 |
|
FTSE China A50
FTXIN9
|
$525.16 Billion | 2.62% | #12 of 50 |
Weight: China Citic Bank Corp Ltd Class A's market cap as a percentage of total index value. Rank: Position among all constituents by market cap.
China Citic Bank Corp Ltd Class A Market Cap to Earnings & Revenue Ratios Timeline
This chart shows how China Citic Bank Corp Ltd Class A's valuation ratios have evolved. The Price to Sales (P/S) ratio compares market cap to revenue, while the Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio compares market cap to net income. Lower values may indicate a more undervalued company relative to its financial performance.
Latest Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio
0.25x
China Citic Bank Corp Ltd Class A's market cap is 0.25 times its annual revenue
0.23x
Higher than industry averageLatest Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio
0.57x
China Citic Bank Corp Ltd Class A's market cap is 0.57 times its annual earnings
1.18x
Lower than industry averageWhat These Ratios Tell Investors:
- Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's sales. Lower P/S ratios may indicate undervaluation.
- Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's earnings. This is one of the most common valuation metrics.
- Trends in these ratios over time can indicate changing investor sentiment about the company's future growth prospects.
- Industry comparison provides context for whether the company is valued higher or lower than peers.
| Year | Market Cap (USD) | Revenue (USD) | Net Income (USD) | P/S Ratio | P/E Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | $27.82 Billion | $256.31 Billion | $41.16 Billion | 0.11x | 0.68x |
| 2016 | $25.58 Billion | $261.12 Billion | $41.63 Billion | 0.10x | 0.61x |
| 2017 | $25.53 Billion | $278.12 Billion | $42.57 Billion | 0.09x | 0.60x |
| 2018 | $23.43 Billion | $294.15 Billion | $44.51 Billion | 0.08x | 0.53x |
| 2019 | $27.59 Billion | $328.71 Billion | $48.02 Billion | 0.08x | 0.57x |
| 2020 | $23.85 Billion | $342.31 Billion | $48.98 Billion | 0.07x | 0.49x |
| 2021 | $22.73 Billion | $362.59 Billion | $55.64 Billion | 0.06x | 0.41x |
| 2022 | $26.17 Billion | $373.76 Billion | $62.10 Billion | 0.07x | 0.42x |
| 2023 | $29.39 Billion | $379.30 Billion | $67.02 Billion | 0.08x | 0.44x |
| 2024 | $38.78 Billion | $152.60 Billion | $68.58 Billion | 0.25x | 0.57x |
Competitor Companies of 601998 by Market Capitalization
Companies near China Citic Bank Corp Ltd Class A in the global market cap rankings as of March 18, 2026.
Key companies related to China Citic Bank Corp Ltd Class A by market ranking:
- Turkiye Is Bankasi AS Class B (IS:ISBTR): Ranked #1 globally with a market cap of $94.82 Trillion USD ( TL3362.39 Trillion TRY).
- State Bank of India GDR (LSE:SBID): Ranked #23 globally with a market cap of $472.37 Billion USD.
- Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (AU:AN3PK): Ranked #80 globally with a market cap of $189.74 Billion USD ( AU$306.43 Billion AUD).
- China Merchants Bank Co Ltd (PINK:CIHKY): Ranked #108 globally with a market cap of $157.57 Billion USD.
| Rank | Company | Symbol | Market Cap | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Turkiye Is Bankasi AS Class B | IS:ISBTR | $94.82 Trillion | TL401000.00 |
| #23 | State Bank of India GDR | LSE:SBID | $472.37 Billion | $115.60 |
| #80 | Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd | AU:AN3PK | $189.74 Billion | AU$102.90 |
| #108 | China Merchants Bank Co Ltd | PINK:CIHKY | $157.57 Billion | $27.05 |
China Citic Bank Corp Ltd Class A Historical Marketcap From 2015 to 2026
Between 2015 and today, China Citic Bank Corp Ltd Class A's market cap moved from $27.82 Billion to $ 41.72 Billion, with a yearly change of 5.33%.
| Year | Market Cap | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | CN¥41.72 Billion | -2.47% |
| 2025 | CN¥42.78 Billion | +10.32% |
| 2024 | CN¥38.78 Billion | +31.95% |
| 2023 | CN¥29.39 Billion | +12.30% |
| 2022 | CN¥26.17 Billion | +15.14% |
| 2021 | CN¥22.73 Billion | -4.71% |
| 2020 | CN¥23.85 Billion | -13.55% |
| 2019 | CN¥27.59 Billion | +17.76% |
| 2018 | CN¥23.43 Billion | -8.22% |
| 2017 | CN¥25.53 Billion | -0.22% |
| 2016 | CN¥25.58 Billion | -8.04% |
| 2015 | CN¥27.82 Billion | -- |
End of Day Market Cap According to Different Sources
On Mar 17th, 2026 the market cap of China Citic Bank Corp Ltd Class A was reported to be:
| Source | Market Cap |
|---|---|
| Yahoo Finance | $41.72 Billion USD |
| MoneyControl | $41.72 Billion USD |
| MarketWatch | $41.72 Billion USD |
| marketcap.company | $41.72 Billion USD |
| Reuters | $41.72 Billion USD |
Market cap values may vary slightly between sources due to differences in calculation methods, timing, and data refresh rates.