Nasdaq Global Travel and Leisur
Nasdaq Global Travel and Leisur operates in various business sectors.
Market Cap & Net Worth: Nasdaq Global Travel and Leisur (A4E1)
Nasdaq Global Travel and Leisur (STU:A4E1) has a market capitalization of $1.52K (€1.48K) as of March 19, 2026. Listed on the STU stock exchange, this Germany-based company holds position #47649 globally and #7993 in its home market, demonstrating a -19.46% decrease in market value over the past year.
Market capitalization, also known as net worth in stock markets, is calculated by multiplying Nasdaq Global Travel and Leisur's stock price €0.15 by its total outstanding shares 9951 (9.95K).
Nasdaq Global Travel and Leisur Market Cap History: 2015 to 2026
Nasdaq Global Travel and Leisur's market capitalization history from 2015 to 2026. Data shows change from $6.17K to $1.52K (-10.59% CAGR).
Nasdaq Global Travel and Leisur Market Cap to Earnings & Revenue Ratios Timeline
This chart shows how Nasdaq Global Travel and Leisur's valuation ratios have evolved. The Price to Sales (P/S) ratio compares market cap to revenue, while the Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio compares market cap to net income. Lower values may indicate a more undervalued company relative to its financial performance.
Latest Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio
No P/S ratio data available
Latest Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio
No P/E ratio data available
What These Ratios Tell Investors:
- Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's sales. Lower P/S ratios may indicate undervaluation.
- Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's earnings. This is one of the most common valuation metrics.
- Trends in these ratios over time can indicate changing investor sentiment about the company's future growth prospects.
- Industry comparison provides context for whether the company is valued higher or lower than peers.
| Year | Market Cap (USD) | Revenue (USD) | Net Income (USD) | P/S Ratio | P/E Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No financial ratio data available | |||||
Competitor Companies of A4E1 by Market Capitalization
Companies near Nasdaq Global Travel and Leisur in the global market cap rankings as of March 19, 2026.
Key companies related to Nasdaq Global Travel and Leisur by market ranking:
- ZAMBIA FORESTRY AND FOREST INDUSTRIES CORPORATION PLC (LUSE:ZFCO): Ranked #47640 globally with a market cap of $1.52K USD ( ZK41.86K ZMW).
- GIORDANO INTL (MU:GIO): Ranked #47641 globally with a market cap of $1.52K USD ( €1.48K EUR).
- Orchard Funding Group PLC (LSE:ORCH): Ranked #47650 globally with a market cap of $1.51K USD ( GBX12.39 Million GBX).
- RENALYTIX SP.ADS/2 (F:2O9A): Ranked #47651 globally with a market cap of $1.50K USD ( €1.46K EUR).
| Rank | Company | Symbol | Market Cap | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #47640 | ZAMBIA FORESTRY AND FOREST INDUSTRIES CORPORATION PLC | LUSE:ZFCO | $1.52K | ZK4.60 |
| #47641 | GIORDANO INTL | MU:GIO | $1.52K | €0.16 |
| #47650 | Orchard Funding Group PLC | LSE:ORCH | $1.51K | GBX57.00 |
| #47651 | RENALYTIX SP.ADS/2 | F:2O9A | $1.50K | €0.16 |
Nasdaq Global Travel and Leisur Historical Marketcap From 2015 to 2026
Between 2015 and today, Nasdaq Global Travel and Leisur's market cap moved from $6.17K to $ 1.52K, with a yearly change of -10.59%.
| Year | Market Cap | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | €1.52K | +40.57% |
| 2025 | €1.08K | +221.21% |
| 2024 | €337.08 | -74.12% |
| 2023 | €1.30K | -40.42% |
| 2022 | €2.19K | -15.42% |
| 2021 | €2.58K | -31.99% |
| 2020 | €3.80K | -22.82% |
| 2019 | €4.92K | -6.95% |
| 2018 | €5.29K | -37.14% |
| 2017 | €8.42K | -14.35% |
| 2016 | €9.83K | +59.27% |
| 2015 | €6.17K | -- |
End of Day Market Cap According to Different Sources
On Mar 18th, 2026 the market cap of Nasdaq Global Travel and Leisur was reported to be:
| Source | Market Cap |
|---|---|
| Yahoo Finance | $1.52K USD |
| MoneyControl | $1.52K USD |
| MarketWatch | $1.52K USD |
| marketcap.company | $1.52K USD |
| Reuters | $1.52K USD |
Market cap values may vary slightly between sources due to differences in calculation methods, timing, and data refresh rates.