iXensor Co., Ltd.

TWO:6734 Taiwan Medical Devices
Market Cap
$8.34 Million
NT$275.83 Million TWD
Market Cap Rank
#31784 Global
#1869 in Taiwan
Share Price
NT$6.79
Change (1 day)
+1.34%
52-Week Range
NT$6.00 - NT$17.85
All Time High
NT$17.85
About

iXensor Co., Ltd. provides technology platform that turns smartphones into medical diagnostic devices through its smart color sensing technology for connected healthcare. It offers PixoTest Vision Analysis System(lipid), and PixoHealth Vision(app) for chronic disease; and Eveline Smart Fertility System and Eveline Care Telehealth Platform for women's health management. The company was founded in … Read more

Market Cap & Net Worth: iXensor Co., Ltd. (6734)

iXensor Co., Ltd. (TWO:6734) has a market capitalization of $8.34 Million (NT$275.83 Million) as of March 19, 2026. Listed on the TWO stock exchange, this Taiwan-based company holds position #31784 globally and #1869 in its home market, demonstrating a -7.62% decrease in market value over the past year.

Market capitalization, also known as net worth in stock markets, is calculated by multiplying iXensor Co., Ltd.'s stock price NT$6.79 by its total outstanding shares 40623164 (40.62 Million).

iXensor Co., Ltd. Market Cap History: 2026 to 2026

iXensor Co., Ltd.'s market capitalization history from 2026 to 2026. Data shows growth from $8.34 Million to $8.34 Million (0.00% CAGR).

iXensor Co., Ltd. Market Cap to Earnings & Revenue Ratios Timeline

This chart shows how iXensor Co., Ltd.'s valuation ratios have evolved. The Price to Sales (P/S) ratio compares market cap to revenue, while the Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio compares market cap to net income. Lower values may indicate a more undervalued company relative to its financial performance.

Latest Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio

No P/S ratio data available

Latest Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio

No P/E ratio data available

What These Ratios Tell Investors:
  • Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's sales. Lower P/S ratios may indicate undervaluation.
  • Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's earnings. This is one of the most common valuation metrics.
  • Trends in these ratios over time can indicate changing investor sentiment about the company's future growth prospects.
  • Industry comparison provides context for whether the company is valued higher or lower than peers.
Year Market Cap (USD) Revenue (USD) Net Income (USD) P/S Ratio P/E Ratio
No financial ratio data available

Competitor Companies of 6734 by Market Capitalization

Companies near iXensor Co., Ltd. in the global market cap rankings as of March 19, 2026.

Key companies related to iXensor Co., Ltd. by market ranking:

  • Abbott Laboratories (NYSE:ABT): Ranked #78 globally with a market cap of $191.37 Billion USD.
  • Stryker Corporation (NYSE:SYK): Ranked #154 globally with a market cap of $121.03 Billion USD.
  • Medtronic PLC (NYSE:MDT): Ranked #168 globally with a market cap of $113.17 Billion USD.
  • Boston Scientific Corp (NYSE:BSX): Ranked #185 globally with a market cap of $105.26 Billion USD.

Market capitalization comparison (in billions USD)
Rank Company Symbol Market Cap Price
#78 Abbott Laboratories NYSE:ABT $191.37 Billion $110.71
#154 Stryker Corporation NYSE:SYK $121.03 Billion $349.11
#168 Medtronic PLC NYSE:MDT $113.17 Billion $88.44
#185 Boston Scientific Corp NYSE:BSX $105.26 Billion $71.20

iXensor Co., Ltd. Historical Marketcap From 2026 to 2026

Between 2026 and today, iXensor Co., Ltd.'s market cap moved from $8.34 Million to $ 8.34 Million, with a yearly change of 0.00%.

Year Market Cap Change (%)
2026 NT$8.34 Million --

End of Day Market Cap According to Different Sources

On Mar 18th, 2026 the market cap of iXensor Co., Ltd. was reported to be:

Source Market Cap
Yahoo Finance $8.34 Million USD
MoneyControl $8.34 Million USD
MarketWatch $8.34 Million USD
marketcap.company $8.34 Million USD
Reuters $8.34 Million USD

Market cap values may vary slightly between sources due to differences in calculation methods, timing, and data refresh rates.