DMS IMAGING S.A.
European Medical Solutions engages in the design, development, and manufacturing of medical imaging systems for digital radiology and bone densitometry in Belgium. It offers R/F solutions, including PLATINUM NEO, a smart solution that revolutionizes the R/F workflow, as well as OPTIMA dRF, a robust solution; bone densitometry and body composition analysis equipment; chest and bone rooms, such as … Read more
Market Cap & Net Worth: DMS IMAGING S.A. (AS0)
DMS IMAGING S.A. (F:AS0) has a market capitalization of $25.98 Million (€25.31 Million) as of March 18, 2026. Listed on the F stock exchange, this Germany-based company holds position #41448 globally and #6273 in its home market, demonstrating a 0.00% increase in market value over the past year.
Market capitalization, also known as net worth in stock markets, is calculated by multiplying DMS IMAGING S.A.'s stock price €5.98 by its total outstanding shares 4231840 (4.23 Million).
DMS IMAGING S.A. Market Cap History: 2021 to 2025
DMS IMAGING S.A.'s market capitalization history from 2021 to 2025. Data shows growth from $764.52K to $25.98 Million (111.27% CAGR).
DMS IMAGING S.A. Market Cap to Earnings & Revenue Ratios Timeline
This chart shows how DMS IMAGING S.A.'s valuation ratios have evolved. The Price to Sales (P/S) ratio compares market cap to revenue, while the Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio compares market cap to net income. Lower values may indicate a more undervalued company relative to its financial performance.
Latest Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio
No P/S ratio data available
Latest Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio
No P/E ratio data available
What These Ratios Tell Investors:
- Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's sales. Lower P/S ratios may indicate undervaluation.
- Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's earnings. This is one of the most common valuation metrics.
- Trends in these ratios over time can indicate changing investor sentiment about the company's future growth prospects.
- Industry comparison provides context for whether the company is valued higher or lower than peers.
| Year | Market Cap (USD) | Revenue (USD) | Net Income (USD) | P/S Ratio | P/E Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No financial ratio data available | |||||
Competitor Companies of AS0 by Market Capitalization
Companies near DMS IMAGING S.A. in the global market cap rankings as of March 18, 2026.
Key companies related to DMS IMAGING S.A. by market ranking:
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc (NASDAQ:VRTX): Ranked #162 globally with a market cap of $117.09 Billion USD.
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc (NASDAQ:REGN): Ranked #281 globally with a market cap of $74.80 Billion USD.
- CSL Limited (PINK:CMXHF): Ranked #344 globally with a market cap of $63.46 Billion USD.
- argenx SE (OTCGREY:ARGNF): Ranked #500 globally with a market cap of $42.99 Billion USD.
| Rank | Company | Symbol | Market Cap | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #162 | Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc | NASDAQ:VRTX | $117.09 Billion | $462.49 |
| #281 | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc | NASDAQ:REGN | $74.80 Billion | $759.05 |
| #344 | CSL Limited | PINK:CMXHF | $63.46 Billion | $149.87 |
| #500 | argenx SE | OTCGREY:ARGNF | $42.99 Billion | $697.42 |
DMS IMAGING S.A. Historical Marketcap From 2021 to 2025
Between 2021 and today, DMS IMAGING S.A.'s market cap moved from $764.52K to $ 25.98 Million, with a yearly change of 111.27%.
| Year | Market Cap | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | €25.98 Million | -2.65% |
| 2024 | €26.69 Million | +33110.81% |
| 2023 | €80.36K | -75.33% |
| 2022 | €325.79K | -57.39% |
| 2021 | €764.52K | -- |
End of Day Market Cap According to Different Sources
On Jan 7th, 2026 the market cap of DMS IMAGING S.A. was reported to be:
| Source | Market Cap |
|---|---|
| Yahoo Finance | $25.98 Million USD |
| MoneyControl | $25.98 Million USD |
| MarketWatch | $25.98 Million USD |
| marketcap.company | $25.98 Million USD |
| Reuters | $25.98 Million USD |
Market cap values may vary slightly between sources due to differences in calculation methods, timing, and data refresh rates.