G.M. LEATHER S.P.A.
G.M. Leather S.p.A. manufactures, market, and sells semi-finished and finished leathers in Italy and internationally. The company offers its products for footwear, furniture, leather goods, and fashion sectors. The company was founded in 2011 and is headquartered in Arzignano, Italy.
Market Cap & Net Worth: G.M. LEATHER S.P.A. (N78)
G.M. LEATHER S.P.A. (F:N78) has a market capitalization of $9.60 Million (€9.35 Million) as of March 18, 2026. Listed on the F stock exchange, this Germany-based company holds position #36108 globally and #4377 in its home market, demonstrating a -3.10% decrease in market value over the past year.
Market capitalization, also known as net worth in stock markets, is calculated by multiplying G.M. LEATHER S.P.A.'s stock price €0.63 by its total outstanding shares 14960558 (14.96 Million).
G.M. LEATHER S.P.A. Market Cap History: 2022 to 2026
G.M. LEATHER S.P.A.'s market capitalization history from 2022 to 2026. Data shows change from $24.07 Million to $9.60 Million (-22.68% CAGR).
G.M. LEATHER S.P.A. Market Cap to Earnings & Revenue Ratios Timeline
This chart shows how G.M. LEATHER S.P.A.'s valuation ratios have evolved. The Price to Sales (P/S) ratio compares market cap to revenue, while the Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio compares market cap to net income. Lower values may indicate a more undervalued company relative to its financial performance.
Latest Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio
No P/S ratio data available
Latest Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio
No P/E ratio data available
What These Ratios Tell Investors:
- Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's sales. Lower P/S ratios may indicate undervaluation.
- Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company's earnings. This is one of the most common valuation metrics.
- Trends in these ratios over time can indicate changing investor sentiment about the company's future growth prospects.
- Industry comparison provides context for whether the company is valued higher or lower than peers.
| Year | Market Cap (USD) | Revenue (USD) | Net Income (USD) | P/S Ratio | P/E Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No financial ratio data available | |||||
Competitor Companies of N78 by Market Capitalization
Companies near G.M. LEATHER S.P.A. in the global market cap rankings as of March 18, 2026.
Key companies related to G.M. LEATHER S.P.A. by market ranking:
- Toray Industries Inc (PINK:TRYIF): Ranked #1736 globally with a market cap of $9.58 Billion USD.
- Shenzhou International Group Holdings Limited (PINK:SHZHY): Ranked #2790 globally with a market cap of $5.00 Billion USD.
- TongKun Group Co Ltd (SHG:601233): Ranked #3316 globally with a market cap of $3.93 Billion USD ( CN¥28.84 Billion CNY).
- Nitto Boseki Co. Ltd (F:NB5): Ranked #3793 globally with a market cap of $3.21 Billion USD ( €3.13 Billion EUR).
| Rank | Company | Symbol | Market Cap | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1736 | Toray Industries Inc | PINK:TRYIF | $9.58 Billion | $6.90 |
| #2790 | Shenzhou International Group Holdings Limited | PINK:SHZHY | $5.00 Billion | $6.30 |
| #3316 | TongKun Group Co Ltd | SHG:601233 | $3.93 Billion | CN¥20.35 |
| #3793 | Nitto Boseki Co. Ltd | F:NB5 | $3.21 Billion | €113.00 |
G.M. LEATHER S.P.A. Historical Marketcap From 2022 to 2026
Between 2022 and today, G.M. LEATHER S.P.A.'s market cap moved from $24.07 Million to $ 9.60 Million, with a yearly change of -22.68%.
| Year | Market Cap | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | €9.60 Million | -14.97% |
| 2025 | €11.29 Million | -31.31% |
| 2024 | €16.43 Million | -18.32% |
| 2023 | €20.12 Million | -16.44% |
| 2022 | €24.07 Million | -- |
End of Day Market Cap According to Different Sources
On Mar 18th, 2026 the market cap of G.M. LEATHER S.P.A. was reported to be:
| Source | Market Cap |
|---|---|
| Yahoo Finance | $9.60 Million USD |
| MoneyControl | $9.60 Million USD |
| MarketWatch | $9.60 Million USD |
| marketcap.company | $9.60 Million USD |
| Reuters | $9.60 Million USD |
Market cap values may vary slightly between sources due to differences in calculation methods, timing, and data refresh rates.