Ferrovial SE (FER) - Total Liabilities

Latest as of December 2025: $19.75 Billion USD

Based on the latest financial reports, Ferrovial SE (FER) has total liabilities worth $19.75 Billion USD as of December 2025. Total liabilities represent everything the company owes to external parties, combining both current liabilities—like accounts payable, short-term debt, and accrued expenses—and non-current liabilities such as long-term debt, pension obligations, lease liabilities, and deferred tax liabilities. Explore Ferrovial SE cash flow conversion to assess how effectively this company generates cash.

Ferrovial SE - Total Liabilities Trend (2004–2025)

This chart illustrates how Ferrovial SE's total liabilities have evolved over time, based on quarterly financial data. Check FER cash and liquid asset ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.

Ferrovial SE Competitors by Total Liabilities

The table below lists competitors of Ferrovial SE ranked by their total liabilities.

Company Country Total Liabilities
Suzhou Dongshan Precision Manufacturing Co Ltd
SHE:002384
China CN¥30.53 Billion
Electronic Arts Inc
NASDAQ:EA
USA $7.13 Billion
Cheniere Energy Inc
NYSE:LNG
USA $33.64 Billion
Infosys Limited
F:IOY
Germany €6.67 Billion
BASF SE
F:BASA
Germany €41.84 Billion
Investor AB ser. A
ST:INVE-A
Sweden Skr148.91 Billion
Autodesk Inc
NASDAQ:ADSK
USA $8.30 Billion

Liability Composition Analysis (2004–2025)

This chart breaks down Ferrovial SE's total liabilities into key components over time: long-term debt, short-term debt, other current liabilities, and other non-current liabilities. Toggle between absolute values and percentage view to see how the composition has shifted. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see FER stock market capitalisation.

Liquidity & Leverage Metrics

Key Metrics Explained

Metric Value Description
Current Ratio 1.13 Measures ability to pay short-term obligations (Current Assets ÷ Current Liabilities)
Quick Ratio N/A More stringent measure of short-term liquidity ((Current Assets - Inventory) ÷ Current Liabilities)
Cash Ratio N/A Most conservative liquidity measure (Cash & Equivalents ÷ Current Liabilities)
Debt to Equity 3.34 Measures financial leverage (Total Liabilities ÷ Shareholder Equity)
Debt to Assets 0.72 Portion of assets financed with debt (Total Liabilities ÷ Total Assets)

Liability Trends Comparison

This chart compares key liability metrics across different time periods, showing how Ferrovial SE's debt structure has evolved. The comparison includes total liabilities, long-term debt, and current liabilities.

Annual Total Liabilities for Ferrovial SE (2004–2025)

The table below shows the annual total liabilities of Ferrovial SE from 2004 to 2025.

Year Total Liabilities Change
2025-12-31 $19.75 Billion -5.38%
2024-12-31 $20.88 Billion +2.15%
2023-12-31 $20.44 Billion +2.55%
2022-12-31 $19.93 Billion +4.58%
2021-12-31 $19.06 Billion -1.26%
2020-12-31 $19.30 Billion +1.47%
2019-12-31 $19.02 Billion +9.01%
2018-12-31 $17.45 Billion +4.14%
2017-12-31 $16.76 Billion -1.91%
2016-12-31 $17.08 Billion -9.34%
2015-12-31 $18.84 Billion -3.13%
2014-12-31 $19.45 Billion +16.16%
2013-12-31 $16.75 Billion +1.77%
2012-12-31 $16.45 Billion -1.38%
2011-12-31 $16.68 Billion -54.49%
2010-12-31 $36.66 Billion -7.32%
2009-12-31 $39.55 Billion -11.14%
2008-12-31 $44.51 Billion -0.51%
2007-12-31 $44.74 Billion -7.04%
2006-12-31 $48.13 Billion +694.05%
2004-12-31 $6.06 Billion --

About Ferrovial SE

NASDAQ:FER USA Engineering & Construction
Market Cap
$49.51 Billion
Market Cap Rank
#534 Global
#261 in USA
Share Price
$68.98
Change (1 day)
+0.10%
52-Week Range
$61.64 - $74.38
All Time High
$74.38
About

Ferrovial SE, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. It operates through four segments: Construction, Highways, Airports, and Energy. The company is involved in the development, financing, and operation of toll road infrastructure and cons… Read more