Archer Materials Ltd (AXE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: -3.77x

Archer Materials Ltd (AXE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -3.77x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of AU$-3.43 Million could theoretically repay -4% of its total liabilities (AU$909.76K) in one year. See AXE cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-3.77x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

AU$-3.43 Million
AUD

Total Liabilities

AU$909.76K
AUD

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

Archer Materials Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2008–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Archer Materials Ltd across 18 annual periods. Also explore Archer Materials Ltd annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Archer Materials Ltd (2008–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Archer Materials Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see AXE market cap.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (AUD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 -5.57x AU$-4.19 Million AU$752.16K ▼ -26.6%
2024 -4.40x AU$-4.79 Million AU$1.09 Million ▼ -75.7%
2023 -2.50x AU$-3.03 Million AU$1.21 Million ▲ +56.6%
2022 -5.76x AU$-4.30 Million AU$746.23K ▼ -90.2%
2021 -3.03x AU$-2.22 Million AU$732.71K ▼ -44.8%
2020 -2.09x AU$-1.50 Million AU$717.86K ▲ +16.8%
2019 -2.51x AU$-1.59 Million AU$631.96K ▼ -40.3%
2018 -1.79x AU$-936.80K AU$522.90K ▲ +12.4%
2017 -2.04x AU$-810.48K AU$396.50K ▲ +19.4%
2016 -2.53x AU$-843.19K AU$332.63K ▼ -97.8%
2015 -1.28x AU$-685.56K AU$534.94K ▼ -92.7%
2014 -0.66x AU$-350.36K AU$526.95K ▼ -29.0%
2013 -0.52x AU$-254.68K AU$494.20K ▲ +65.1%
2012 -1.48x AU$-691.66K AU$468.05K ▼ -34.2%
2011 -1.10x AU$-590.52K AU$536.19K ▲ +52.6%
2010 -2.32x AU$-343.29K AU$147.75K ▼ -42.9%
2009 -1.63x AU$-330.52K AU$203.32K ▼ -2201.5%
2008 0.08x AU$29.52K AU$381.66K —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.