Environmental Clean Technologies Ltd (ECT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: -0.65x

Environmental Clean Technologies Ltd (ECT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.65x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of AU$-946.60K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (AU$1.46 Million) in one year. See ECT free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.65x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

AU$-946.60K
AUD

Total Liabilities

AU$1.46 Million
AUD

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

Environmental Clean Technologies Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Environmental Clean Technologies Ltd across 14 annual periods. Also explore ECT net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Environmental Clean Technologies Ltd (2001–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Environmental Clean Technologies Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ECT market cap.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (AUD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 -0.43x AU$-1.02 Million AU$2.40 Million ▲ +60.3%
2024 -1.07x AU$-2.71 Million AU$2.53 Million ▼ -219.3%
2023 -0.34x AU$-1.60 Million AU$4.75 Million ▲ +29.8%
2022 -0.48x AU$-2.35 Million AU$4.91 Million ▼ -215.8%
2021 -0.15x AU$-840.89K AU$5.55 Million ▲ +80.5%
2020 -0.78x AU$-1.81 Million AU$2.32 Million ▼ -5.2%
2019 -0.74x AU$-3.26 Million AU$4.41 Million ▲ +37.3%
2018 -1.18x AU$-4.33 Million AU$3.68 Million ▼ -133.4%
2017 -0.50x AU$-2.27 Million AU$4.50 Million ▼ -46.1%
2016 -0.35x AU$-1.37 Million AU$3.96 Million ▼ -18.2%
2015 -0.29x AU$-1.57 Million AU$5.37 Million ▲ +48.2%
2014 -0.56x AU$-1.67 Million AU$2.95 Million ▲ +37.9%
2013 -0.91x AU$-3.90 Million AU$4.29 Million ▼ -234.5%
2001 0.68x AU$4.21 Million AU$6.22 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.