Latrobe Magnesium Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Latrobe Magnesium Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Latrobe Magnesium Ltd (LMG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of AU$3.44 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (AU$43.04 Million) in one year. Check how high is Latrobe Magnesium Ltd's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Latrobe Magnesium Ltd (1991–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Latrobe Magnesium Ltd from 1991 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Latrobe Magnesium Ltd across 35 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Latrobe Magnesium Ltd reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Latrobe Magnesium Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1991–2025)
Latrobe Magnesium Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1991 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Latrobe Magnesium Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Latrobe Magnesium Ltd.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (AUD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | AU$8.10 Million | AU$43.84 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2024 | 0.21x | AU$11.50 Million | AU$53.78 Million | ▲ +179617.2% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | AU$-4.31K | AU$36.16 Million | ▲ +100.0% |
| 2022 | -0.25x | AU$-3.74 Million | AU$14.68 Million | ▼ -135.3% |
| 2021 | 0.72x | AU$5.89 Million | AU$8.15 Million | ▲ +936.6% |
| 2020 | -0.09x | AU$-1.06 Million | AU$12.24 Million | ▲ +80.3% |
| 2019 | -0.44x | AU$-1.20K | AU$2.75K | ▲ +48.0% |
| 2018 | -0.84x | AU$-1.24K | AU$1.47K | ▲ +69.2% |
| 2017 | -2.73x | AU$-2.18K | AU$797.69 | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2016 | -1.62x | AU$-979.10 | AU$605.54 | ▲ +34.3% |
| 2015 | -2.46x | AU$-648.64 | AU$263.58 | ▼ -132.7% |
| 2014 | -1.06x | AU$-501.00 | AU$473.73 | ▼ -450861.6% |
| 2013 | 0.00x | AU$-172.37 | AU$735.01K | ▲ +100.0% |
| 2012 | -9.46x | AU$-1.05 Million | AU$111.03K | ▼ -12.4% |
| 2011 | -8.41x | AU$-535.14K | AU$63.60K | ▼ -1755.0% |
| 2010 | -0.45x | AU$-89.11K | AU$196.47K | ▲ +79.5% |
| 2009 | -2.21x | AU$-226.74K | AU$102.60K | ▲ +73.9% |
| 2008 | -8.48x | AU$-406.51K | AU$47.95K | ▼ -9.5% |
| 2007 | -7.74x | AU$-245.42K | AU$31.70K | ▼ -112.5% |
| 2006 | -3.64x | AU$-300.79K | AU$82.57K | ▼ -118.0% |
| 2005 | -1.67x | AU$-287.57K | AU$172.11K | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2004 | -2.30x | AU$-522.67K | AU$227.65K | ▼ -17108.1% |
| 2003 | 0.01x | AU$5.55K | AU$411.44K | ▲ +100.5% |
| 2002 | -2.64x | AU$-959.33K | AU$363.62K | ▼ -138.4% |
| 2001 | 6.87x | AU$1.31 Million | AU$190.51K | ▲ +240.6% |
| 2000 | 2.02x | AU$732.61K | AU$363.09K | ▲ +3823.9% |
| 1999 | -0.05x | AU$-33.45K | AU$617.45K | ▲ +97.4% |
| 1998 | -2.08x | AU$-313.41K | AU$150.86K | ▼ -627.6% |
| 1997 | -0.29x | AU$-90.85K | AU$318.20K | ▲ +69.4% |
| 1996 | -0.93x | AU$-622.20K | AU$666.06K | ▲ +61.9% |
| 1995 | -2.45x | AU$-572.00K | AU$233.00K | ▼ -569.0% |
| 1994 | 0.52x | AU$190.00K | AU$363.00K | ▲ +380.4% |
| 1993 | -0.19x | AU$-28.00K | AU$150.00K | ▲ +96.1% |
| 1992 | -4.80x | AU$-245.00K | AU$51.00K | ▲ +44.5% |
| 1991 | -8.66x | AU$-433.00K | AU$50.00K | — |