Latrobe Magnesium Ltd (LMG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Latrobe Magnesium Ltd (LMG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of AU$3.44 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (AU$43.04 Million) in one year. See Latrobe Magnesium Ltd (LMG) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Latrobe Magnesium Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Latrobe Magnesium Ltd across 35 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Latrobe Magnesium Ltd.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Latrobe Magnesium Ltd (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Latrobe Magnesium Ltd. Check LMG cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (AUD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | AU$8.10 Million | AU$43.84 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2024 | 0.21x | AU$11.50 Million | AU$53.78 Million | ▲ +179617.2% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | AU$-4.31K | AU$36.16 Million | ▲ +100.0% |
| 2022 | -0.25x | AU$-3.74 Million | AU$14.68 Million | ▼ -135.3% |
| 2021 | 0.72x | AU$5.89 Million | AU$8.15 Million | ▲ +936.6% |
| 2020 | -0.09x | AU$-1.06 Million | AU$12.24 Million | ▲ +80.3% |
| 2019 | -0.44x | AU$-1.20K | AU$2.75K | ▲ +48.0% |
| 2018 | -0.84x | AU$-1.24K | AU$1.47K | ▲ +69.2% |
| 2017 | -2.73x | AU$-2.18K | AU$797.69 | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2016 | -1.62x | AU$-979.10 | AU$605.54 | ▲ +34.3% |
| 2015 | -2.46x | AU$-648.64 | AU$263.58 | ▼ -132.7% |
| 2014 | -1.06x | AU$-501.00 | AU$473.73 | ▼ -450861.6% |
| 2013 | 0.00x | AU$-172.37 | AU$735.01K | ▲ +100.0% |
| 2012 | -9.46x | AU$-1.05 Million | AU$111.03K | ▼ -12.4% |
| 2011 | -8.41x | AU$-535.14K | AU$63.60K | ▼ -1755.0% |
| 2010 | -0.45x | AU$-89.11K | AU$196.47K | ▲ +79.5% |
| 2009 | -2.21x | AU$-226.74K | AU$102.60K | ▲ +73.9% |
| 2008 | -8.48x | AU$-406.51K | AU$47.95K | ▼ -9.5% |
| 2007 | -7.74x | AU$-245.42K | AU$31.70K | ▼ -112.5% |
| 2006 | -3.64x | AU$-300.79K | AU$82.57K | ▼ -118.0% |
| 2005 | -1.67x | AU$-287.57K | AU$172.11K | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2004 | -2.30x | AU$-522.67K | AU$227.65K | ▼ -17108.1% |
| 2003 | 0.01x | AU$5.55K | AU$411.44K | ▲ +100.5% |
| 2002 | -2.64x | AU$-959.33K | AU$363.62K | ▼ -138.4% |
| 2001 | 6.87x | AU$1.31 Million | AU$190.51K | ▲ +240.6% |
| 2000 | 2.02x | AU$732.61K | AU$363.09K | ▲ +3823.9% |
| 1999 | -0.05x | AU$-33.45K | AU$617.45K | ▲ +97.4% |
| 1998 | -2.08x | AU$-313.41K | AU$150.86K | ▼ -627.6% |
| 1997 | -0.29x | AU$-90.85K | AU$318.20K | ▲ +69.4% |
| 1996 | -0.93x | AU$-622.20K | AU$666.06K | ▲ +61.9% |
| 1995 | -2.45x | AU$-572.00K | AU$233.00K | ▼ -569.0% |
| 1994 | 0.52x | AU$190.00K | AU$363.00K | ▲ +380.4% |
| 1993 | -0.19x | AU$-28.00K | AU$150.00K | ▲ +96.1% |
| 1992 | -4.80x | AU$-245.00K | AU$51.00K | ▲ +44.5% |
| 1991 | -8.66x | AU$-433.00K | AU$50.00K | — |