Latrobe Magnesium Ltd (LMG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Latrobe Magnesium Ltd (LMG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of AU$3.44 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (AU$43.04 Million) in one year. Check Latrobe Magnesium Ltd (LMG) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Latrobe Magnesium Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Latrobe Magnesium Ltd across 35 annual periods. Also explore Latrobe Magnesium Ltd (LMG) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Latrobe Magnesium Ltd (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Latrobe Magnesium Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see LMG stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (AUD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | AU$8.10 Million | AU$43.84 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2024 | 0.21x | AU$11.50 Million | AU$53.78 Million | ▲ +179617.2% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | AU$-4.31K | AU$36.16 Million | ▲ +100.0% |
| 2022 | -0.25x | AU$-3.74 Million | AU$14.68 Million | ▼ -135.3% |
| 2021 | 0.72x | AU$5.89 Million | AU$8.15 Million | ▲ +936.6% |
| 2020 | -0.09x | AU$-1.06 Million | AU$12.24 Million | ▲ +80.3% |
| 2019 | -0.44x | AU$-1.20K | AU$2.75K | ▲ +48.0% |
| 2018 | -0.84x | AU$-1.24K | AU$1.47K | ▲ +69.2% |
| 2017 | -2.73x | AU$-2.18K | AU$797.69 | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2016 | -1.62x | AU$-979.10 | AU$605.54 | ▲ +34.3% |
| 2015 | -2.46x | AU$-648.64 | AU$263.58 | ▼ -132.7% |
| 2014 | -1.06x | AU$-501.00 | AU$473.73 | ▼ -450861.6% |
| 2013 | 0.00x | AU$-172.37 | AU$735.01K | ▲ +100.0% |
| 2012 | -9.46x | AU$-1.05 Million | AU$111.03K | ▼ -12.4% |
| 2011 | -8.41x | AU$-535.14K | AU$63.60K | ▼ -1755.0% |
| 2010 | -0.45x | AU$-89.11K | AU$196.47K | ▲ +79.5% |
| 2009 | -2.21x | AU$-226.74K | AU$102.60K | ▲ +73.9% |
| 2008 | -8.48x | AU$-406.51K | AU$47.95K | ▼ -9.5% |
| 2007 | -7.74x | AU$-245.42K | AU$31.70K | ▼ -112.5% |
| 2006 | -3.64x | AU$-300.79K | AU$82.57K | ▼ -118.0% |
| 2005 | -1.67x | AU$-287.57K | AU$172.11K | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2004 | -2.30x | AU$-522.67K | AU$227.65K | ▼ -17108.1% |
| 2003 | 0.01x | AU$5.55K | AU$411.44K | ▲ +100.5% |
| 2002 | -2.64x | AU$-959.33K | AU$363.62K | ▼ -138.4% |
| 2001 | 6.87x | AU$1.31 Million | AU$190.51K | ▲ +240.6% |
| 2000 | 2.02x | AU$732.61K | AU$363.09K | ▲ +3823.9% |
| 1999 | -0.05x | AU$-33.45K | AU$617.45K | ▲ +97.4% |
| 1998 | -2.08x | AU$-313.41K | AU$150.86K | ▼ -627.6% |
| 1997 | -0.29x | AU$-90.85K | AU$318.20K | ▲ +69.4% |
| 1996 | -0.93x | AU$-622.20K | AU$666.06K | ▲ +61.9% |
| 1995 | -2.45x | AU$-572.00K | AU$233.00K | ▼ -569.0% |
| 1994 | 0.52x | AU$190.00K | AU$363.00K | ▲ +380.4% |
| 1993 | -0.19x | AU$-28.00K | AU$150.00K | ▲ +96.1% |
| 1992 | -4.80x | AU$-245.00K | AU$51.00K | ▲ +44.5% |
| 1991 | -8.66x | AU$-433.00K | AU$50.00K | — |