Netlinkz Ltd (NET) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2025: -0.06x

Netlinkz Ltd (NET) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of AU$-1.69 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (AU$28.13 Million) in one year. Explore NET long-term asset investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.06x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

AU$-1.69 Million
AUD

Total Liabilities

AU$28.13 Million
AUD

Data as of

Jun 2025
Most recent filing

Netlinkz Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2009–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Netlinkz Ltd across 17 annual periods. Also explore NET asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Netlinkz Ltd (2009–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Netlinkz Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Netlinkz Ltd (NET) market capitalisation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (AUD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 -0.06x AU$-1.69 Million AU$28.13 Million ▲ +82.2%
2024 -0.34x AU$-6.31 Million AU$18.75 Million ▲ +76.2%
2023 -1.41x AU$-15.60 Million AU$11.04 Million ▲ +43.9%
2022 -2.52x AU$-6.22 Million AU$2.47 Million ▼ -44.9%
2021 -1.74x AU$-9.79 Million AU$5.63 Million ▼ -291.0%
2020 -0.44x AU$-8.89 Million AU$20.01 Million ▲ +24.9%
2019 -0.59x AU$-6.93 Million AU$11.71 Million ▲ +14.1%
2018 -0.69x AU$-4.70 Million AU$6.83 Million ▲ +19.5%
2017 -0.86x AU$-4.93 Million AU$5.76 Million ▼ -3.3%
2016 -0.83x AU$-5.94 Million AU$7.17 Million ▲ +61.3%
2015 -2.14x AU$-5.14 Million AU$2.40 Million ▲ +81.0%
2014 -11.28x AU$-1.49 Million AU$132.48K ▼ -135.6%
2013 -4.79x AU$-1.22 Million AU$255.34K ▼ -22976.6%
2012 0.02x AU$16.00K AU$764.18K ▲ +105.4%
2011 -0.39x AU$-2.31 Million AU$5.95 Million ▼ -389.1%
2010 0.13x AU$681.00K AU$5.07 Million ▼ -83.1%
2009 0.79x AU$3.23 Million AU$4.07 Million —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.