Resonance Health Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Resonance Health Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Resonance Health Ltd (RHT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of AU$173.36K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (AU$7.02 Million) in one year. Check RHT cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Resonance Health Ltd (1992–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Resonance Health Ltd from 1992 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Resonance Health Ltd across 32 annual periods. Check RHT total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Resonance Health Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1992–2025)
Resonance Health Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1992 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Resonance Health Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see RHT cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (AUD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.15x | AU$1.25 Million | AU$8.50 Million | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | AU$1.39 Million | AU$9.35 Million | ▲ +199.0% |
| 2023 | -0.15x | AU$-157.03K | AU$1.05 Million | ▲ +89.7% |
| 2022 | -1.46x | AU$-1.46 Million | AU$995.58K | ▼ -176.5% |
| 2021 | 1.91x | AU$1.17 Million | AU$611.74K | ▼ -13.9% |
| 2020 | 2.22x | AU$1.31 Million | AU$591.04K | ▼ -28.2% |
| 2019 | 3.09x | AU$1.62 Million | AU$523.06K | ▲ +350.7% |
| 2018 | 0.69x | AU$377.97K | AU$551.67K | ▲ +314.6% |
| 2017 | -0.32x | AU$-282.32K | AU$884.21K | ▼ -567.8% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | AU$60.94K | AU$892.90K | ▼ -72.8% |
| 2015 | 0.25x | AU$197.16K | AU$787.16K | ▲ +873.0% |
| 2014 | -0.03x | AU$-30.39K | AU$937.85K | ▼ -119.7% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | AU$137.03K | AU$833.75K | ▲ +55.7% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | AU$83.21K | AU$788.05K | ▲ +152.5% |
| 2011 | -0.20x | AU$-116.55K | AU$579.58K | ▼ -231.1% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | AU$79.81K | AU$520.49K | ▼ -88.9% |
| 2009 | 1.38x | AU$534.73K | AU$386.69K | ▲ +209.0% |
| 2008 | 0.45x | AU$113.37K | AU$253.32K | ▲ +120.4% |
| 2007 | -2.20x | AU$-952.10K | AU$433.41K | ▲ +66.5% |
| 2006 | -6.56x | AU$-2.81 Million | AU$428.15K | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2005 | -5.77x | AU$-2.34 Million | AU$405.75K | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2004 | -5.23x | AU$-1.37 Million | AU$262.87K | ▲ +84.0% |
| 2003 | -32.75x | AU$-961.07K | AU$29.35K | ▼ -42152.8% |
| 2002 | -0.08x | AU$-636.33K | AU$8.21 Million | ▲ +86.8% |
| 2000 | -0.59x | AU$-7.84 Million | AU$13.41 Million | ▲ +82.2% |
| 1999 | -3.29x | AU$-5.23 Million | AU$1.59 Million | ▼ -1264.4% |
| 1998 | -0.24x | AU$-3.93 Million | AU$16.32 Million | ▼ -86.7% |
| 1997 | -0.13x | AU$-1.90 Million | AU$14.71 Million | ▼ -855.7% |
| 1996 | -0.01x | AU$-183.10K | AU$13.56 Million | ▼ -551.1% |
| 1995 | 0.00x | AU$7.00K | AU$2.34 Million | ▲ +100.1% |
| 1993 | -2.41x | AU$-188.00K | AU$78.00K | ▲ +66.7% |
| 1992 | -7.23x | AU$-159.00K | AU$22.00K | — |