Spirit Technology Solutions Ltd (ST1) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Spirit Technology Solutions Ltd (ST1) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of AU$-2.67 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (AU$74.11 Million) in one year. See Spirit Technology Solutions Ltd (ST1) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Spirit Technology Solutions Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Spirit Technology Solutions Ltd across 27 annual periods. Also explore ST1 net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Spirit Technology Solutions Ltd (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Spirit Technology Solutions Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ST1 stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (AUD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.03x | AU$-2.19 Million | AU$74.11 Million | ▲ +29.5% |
| 2024 | -0.04x | AU$-4.13 Million | AU$98.37 Million | ▲ +25.7% |
| 2023 | -0.06x | AU$-3.73 Million | AU$66.05 Million | ▼ -200.3% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | AU$3.61 Million | AU$64.09 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | AU$5.04 Million | AU$67.64 Million | ▼ -65.8% |
| 2020 | 0.22x | AU$3.71 Million | AU$16.99 Million | ▼ -22.1% |
| 2019 | 0.28x | AU$2.33 Million | AU$8.32 Million | ▲ +7.2% |
| 2018 | 0.26x | AU$1.69 Million | AU$6.48 Million | ▲ +18.7% |
| 2017 | 0.22x | AU$1.39 Million | AU$6.31 Million | ▲ +4668.7% |
| 2016 | 0.00x | AU$-19.70K | AU$4.10 Million | ▼ -100.0% |
| 2015 | 9.95x | AU$1.56 Million | AU$156.58K | ▲ +5261.4% |
| 2014 | 0.19x | AU$41.15K | AU$221.68K | ▲ +103.0% |
| 2013 | -6.29x | AU$-1.15 Million | AU$182.81K | ▼ -432.0% |
| 2012 | -1.18x | AU$-880.88K | AU$744.95K | ▲ +17.8% |
| 2011 | -1.44x | AU$-475.69K | AU$330.86K | ▼ -77.3% |
| 2010 | -0.81x | AU$-225.83K | AU$278.54K | ▼ -234.5% |
| 2009 | -0.24x | AU$-241.61K | AU$996.72K | ▲ +83.7% |
| 2008 | -1.48x | AU$-552.48K | AU$372.53K | ▲ +58.4% |
| 2007 | -3.56x | AU$-699.16K | AU$196.13K | ▼ -292.6% |
| 2006 | -0.91x | AU$-1.18 Million | AU$1.30 Million | ▲ +60.4% |
| 2005 | -2.29x | AU$-4.72 Million | AU$2.06 Million | ▲ +64.3% |
| 2004 | -6.42x | AU$-4.40 Million | AU$685.10K | ▼ -2062.7% |
| 2003 | -0.30x | AU$-235.34K | AU$793.38K | ▲ +98.9% |
| 2002 | -26.49x | AU$-3.14 Million | AU$118.41K | ▼ -2456.3% |
| 2001 | -1.04x | AU$-2.58 Million | AU$2.49 Million | ▼ -306.7% |
| 2000 | 0.50x | AU$1.52 Million | AU$3.04 Million | ▼ -43.2% |
| 1999 | 0.88x | AU$446.57K | AU$505.76K | — |