Asefa Public Company Limited (ASEFA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: 0.10x

Asefa Public Company Limited (ASEFA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ฿244.15 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (฿2.43 Billion) in one year. See Asefa Public Company Limited (ASEFA) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.10x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

฿244.15 Million
THB

Total Liabilities

฿2.43 Billion
THB

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

Asefa Public Company Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2011–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Asefa Public Company Limited across 15 annual periods. Also explore ASEFA net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Asefa Public Company Limited (2011–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Asefa Public Company Limited. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ASEFA market cap.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (THB) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.25x ฿595.31 Million ฿2.43 Billion ▼ -33.9%
2024 0.37x ฿581.40 Million ฿1.57 Billion ▲ +731.5%
2023 0.04x ฿78.28 Million ฿1.75 Billion ▲ +213.7%
2022 -0.04x ฿-52.53 Million ฿1.34 Billion ▼ -120.2%
2021 0.19x ฿167.01 Million ฿859.66 Million ▲ +52.5%
2020 0.13x ฿106.19 Million ฿833.64 Million ▼ -84.7%
2019 0.83x ฿490.42 Million ฿587.84 Million ▲ +1558.1%
2018 -0.06x ฿-54.07 Million ฿945.01 Million ▼ -109.6%
2017 0.60x ฿504.39 Million ฿842.61 Million ▲ +62.7%
2016 0.37x ฿306.34 Million ฿832.67 Million ▲ +682.3%
2015 -0.06x ฿-63.29 Million ฿1.00 Billion ▼ -222.5%
2014 0.05x ฿57.49 Million ฿1.11 Billion ▼ -44.8%
2013 0.09x ฿110.27 Million ฿1.18 Billion ▲ +87.1%
2012 0.05x ฿47.35 Million ฿948.16 Million ▼ -51.4%
2011 0.10x ฿98.29 Million ฿957.28 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.