LH Shopping Centers Leasehold Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.03x

LH Shopping Centers Leasehold cash flow-to-debt ratio. LH Shopping Centers Leasehold (LHSC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ฿110.99 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (฿3.94 Billion) in one year. Check LH Shopping Centers Leasehold cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.03x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

฿110.99 Million
THB

Total Liabilities

฿3.94 Billion
THB

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of LH Shopping Centers Leasehold (2015–2024)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of LH Shopping Centers Leasehold from 2015 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for LH Shopping Centers Leasehold across 10 annual periods. Check LH Shopping Centers Leasehold (LHSC) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

LH Shopping Centers Leasehold Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2015–2024)

LH Shopping Centers Leasehold cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2015 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for LH Shopping Centers Leasehold. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does LH Shopping Centers Leasehold generate cash.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (THB) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 -0.88x ฿-3.55 Billion ฿4.04 Billion ▼ -298.8%
2023 0.44x ฿505.20 Million ฿1.14 Billion ▲ +131.5%
2022 0.19x ฿223.43 Million ฿1.17 Billion ▲ +155.4%
2021 0.07x ฿85.76 Million ฿1.15 Billion ▼ -76.6%
2020 0.32x ฿373.53 Million ฿1.17 Billion ▼ -17.9%
2019 0.39x ฿503.04 Million ฿1.29 Billion ▼ -23.2%
2018 0.51x ฿662.84 Million ฿1.31 Billion ▲ +53.5%
2017 0.33x ฿483.60 Million ฿1.47 Billion ▼ -13.7%
2016 0.38x ฿554.24 Million ฿1.45 Billion ▲ +135.4%
2015 0.16x ฿235.78 Million ฿1.45 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.