China Shineway Pharmaceutical Group Limited (C1S) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2023: 0.07x

China Shineway Pharmaceutical Group Limited (C1S) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of June 2023, meaning its operating cash flow of €160.69 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (€2.26 Billion) in one year. Check C1S capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.07x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

€160.69 Million
EUR

Total Liabilities

€2.26 Billion
EUR

Data as of

Jun 2023
Most recent filing

China Shineway Pharmaceutical Group Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2013–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for China Shineway Pharmaceutical Group Limited across 13 annual periods. Also explore China Shineway Pharmaceutical Group Limi balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for China Shineway Pharmaceutical Group Limited (2013–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for China Shineway Pharmaceutical Group Limited. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of China Shineway Pharmaceutical Group Limi.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (EUR) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.43x €1.17 Billion €2.72 Billion ▲ +15.4%
2024 0.37x €963.13 Million €2.57 Billion ▲ +1.9%
2023 0.37x €932.63 Million €2.54 Billion ▼ -38.8%
2022 0.60x €1.11 Billion €1.85 Billion ▲ +11.1%
2021 0.54x €703.15 Million €1.30 Billion ▲ +20.0%
2020 0.45x €638.57 Million €1.42 Billion ▲ +65.6%
2019 0.27x €368.00 Million €1.35 Billion ▼ -50.7%
2018 0.55x €532.59 Million €966.01 Million ▼ -5.1%
2017 0.58x €490.65 Million €844.16 Million ▼ -33.6%
2016 0.87x €733.53 Million €838.59 Million ▲ +0.7%
2015 0.87x €744.71 Million €857.13 Million ▲ +14.0%
2014 0.76x €773.16 Million €1.01 Billion ▲ +91.9%
2013 0.40x €519.89 Million €1.31 Billion
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.