Commerzbank AG Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2020: -0.02x

Commerzbank AG cash flow-to-debt ratio. Commerzbank AG (ZZMS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of December 2020, meaning its operating cash flow of €-7.70 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (€478.32 Billion) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Commerzbank AG to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.02x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

€-7.70 Billion
EUR

Total Liabilities

€478.32 Billion
EUR

Data as of

Dec 2020
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Commerzbank AG (2013–2025)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Commerzbank AG from 2013 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Commerzbank AG across 13 annual periods. Check ZZMS cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

Commerzbank AG Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2013–2025)

Commerzbank AG cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2013 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Commerzbank AG. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Commerzbank AG operating cash flow efficiency.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (EUR) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 -0.01x €-6.73 Billion €554.73 Billion ▲ +69.0%
2024 -0.04x €-20.30 Billion €518.93 Billion ▼ -194.3%
2023 0.04x €20.09 Billion €484.16 Billion ▼ -28.4%
2022 0.06x €25.86 Billion €446.53 Billion ▲ +205.8%
2021 -0.05x €-24.26 Billion €443.22 Billion ▼ -177.7%
2020 0.07x €33.68 Billion €478.32 Billion ▲ +382.6%
2019 -0.02x €-10.79 Billion €432.97 Billion ▼ -2583.3%
2018 0.00x €-402.00 Million €432.96 Billion ▼ -101.9%
2017 0.05x €20.40 Billion €422.45 Billion ▲ +200.2%
2016 0.02x €7.25 Billion €450.81 Billion ▲ +186.5%
2015 0.01x €2.82 Billion €502.58 Billion ▼ -90.5%
2014 0.06x €31.30 Billion €531.28 Billion ▲ +262.9%
2013 -0.04x €-18.91 Billion €522.72 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.