Ozderici Gayrimenkul Yatirim Ortakligi AS (OZGYO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.09x

Ozderici Gayrimenkul Yatirim Ortakligi AS (OZGYO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of TL34.33 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (TL364.02 Million) in one year. See Ozderici Gayrimenkul Yatirim Ortakligi A (OZGYO) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.09x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

TL34.33 Million
TRY

Total Liabilities

TL364.02 Million
TRY

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Ozderici Gayrimenkul Yatirim Ortakligi AS Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2014–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Ozderici Gayrimenkul Yatirim Ortakligi AS across 11 annual periods. Also explore Ozderici Gayrimenkul Yatirim Ortakligi A net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Ozderici Gayrimenkul Yatirim Ortakligi AS (2014–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ozderici Gayrimenkul Yatirim Ortakligi AS. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Ozderici Gayrimenkul Yatirim Ortakligi A market cap and net worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (TRY) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.17x TL108.38 Million TL628.66 Million ▼ -95.5%
2023 3.86x TL246.63 Million TL63.96 Million ▲ +62.7%
2022 2.37x TL95.78 Million TL40.41 Million ▲ +778.4%
2021 -0.35x TL-14.45 Million TL41.35 Million ▼ -227.2%
2020 0.27x TL13.81 Million TL50.25 Million ▲ +283.3%
2019 -0.15x TL-15.22 Million TL101.60 Million ▲ +74.3%
2018 -0.58x TL-80.55 Million TL138.15 Million ▼ -235.9%
2017 -0.17x TL-37.04 Million TL213.35 Million ▲ +20.2%
2016 -0.22x TL-38.53 Million TL177.17 Million ▼ -19.0%
2015 -0.18x TL-27.35 Million TL149.64 Million ▲ +46.0%
2014 -0.34x TL-36.71 Million TL108.40 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.