Sanifoam Sunger Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (SANFM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2025: 0.00x

Sanifoam Sunger Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (SANFM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of TL-4.05 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (TL931.20 Million) in one year. Check Sanifoam Sunger Sanayi ve Ticaret AS cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.00x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

TL-4.05 Million
TRY

Total Liabilities

TL931.20 Million
TRY

Data as of

Jun 2025
Most recent filing

Sanifoam Sunger Sanayi ve Ticaret AS Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2009–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Sanifoam Sunger Sanayi ve Ticaret AS across 13 annual periods. Also explore SANFM total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Sanifoam Sunger Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (2009–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sanifoam Sunger Sanayi ve Ticaret AS. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Sanifoam Sunger Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (SANFM) market capitalisation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (TRY) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 -0.29x TL-135.40 Million TL467.76 Million ▼ -7.9%
2023 -0.27x TL-166.81 Million TL621.60 Million ▼ -86.9%
2022 -0.14x TL-33.95 Million TL236.50 Million ▼ -264.4%
2021 0.09x TL11.91 Million TL136.40 Million ▲ +14.5%
2020 0.08x TL8.04 Million TL105.38 Million ▼ -28.5%
2019 0.11x TL7.65 Million TL71.70 Million ▼ -1.8%
2018 0.11x TL6.33 Million TL58.28 Million ▲ +71.7%
2017 0.06x TL3.05 Million TL48.27 Million ▼ -57.3%
2016 0.15x TL6.09 Million TL41.09 Million ▲ +279.4%
2015 -0.08x TL-3.09 Million TL37.40 Million ▼ -5.0%
2014 -0.08x TL-2.70 Million TL34.35 Million ▼ -211.6%
2011 0.07x TL1.39 Million TL19.73 Million ▼ -42.3%
2009 0.12x TL1.32 Million TL10.83 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.