Turkiye Sise ve Cam Fabrikalari AS Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Turkiye Sise ve Cam Fabrikalari AS cash flow-to-debt ratio. Turkiye Sise ve Cam Fabrikalari AS (SISE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of TL10.75 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (TL237.67 Billion) in one year. Check Turkiye Sise ve Cam Fabrikalari AS (SISE) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Turkiye Sise ve Cam Fabrikalari AS (2000–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Turkiye Sise ve Cam Fabrikalari AS from 2000 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Turkiye Sise ve Cam Fabrikalari AS across 26 annual periods. Check how high is Turkiye Sise ve Cam Fabrikalari AS's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Turkiye Sise ve Cam Fabrikalari AS Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2000–2025)
Turkiye Sise ve Cam Fabrikalari AS cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2000 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Turkiye Sise ve Cam Fabrikalari AS. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see SISE cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (TRY) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.17x | TL39.73 Billion | TL237.67 Billion | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2024 | 0.20x | TL38.55 Billion | TL190.92 Billion | ▼ -54.0% |
| 2023 | 0.44x | TL54.52 Billion | TL124.09 Billion | ▲ +141.8% |
| 2022 | 0.18x | TL12.50 Billion | TL68.82 Billion | ▲ +8.4% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | TL6.59 Billion | TL39.31 Billion | ▲ +36.8% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | TL2.66 Billion | TL21.74 Billion | ▲ +4.4% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | TL2.30 Billion | TL19.62 Billion | ▼ -19.6% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | TL1.61 Billion | TL11.04 Billion | ▼ -37.9% |
| 2017 | 0.23x | TL1.94 Billion | TL8.25 Billion | ▲ +117.5% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | TL844.92 Million | TL7.82 Billion | ▼ -6.8% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | TL713.67 Million | TL6.16 Billion | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | TL767.92 Million | TL5.11 Billion | ▲ +33.8% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | TL546.82 Million | TL4.87 Billion | ▼ -51.3% |
| 2012 | 0.23x | TL719.30 Million | TL3.12 Billion | ▼ -26.0% |
| 2011 | 0.31x | TL966.06 Million | TL3.10 Billion | ▲ +61.6% |
| 2010 | 0.19x | TL506.15 Million | TL2.62 Billion | ▼ -25.7% |
| 2009 | 0.26x | TL773.09 Million | TL2.98 Billion | ▲ +189.1% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | TL248.19 Million | TL2.76 Billion | ▼ -56.9% |
| 2007 | 0.21x | TL386.43 Million | TL1.85 Billion | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2006 | 0.24x | TL441.86 Million | TL1.84 Billion | ▼ -16.7% |
| 2005 | 0.29x | TL398.93 Million | TL1.38 Billion | ▼ -31.9% |
| 2004 | 0.42x | TL469.29 Million | TL1.11 Billion | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.42x | TL403.16 Trillion | TL949.99 Trillion | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2002 | 0.44x | TL416.77 Trillion | TL939.43 Trillion | ▲ +22.5% |
| 2001 | 0.36x | TL275.47 Trillion | TL760.35 Trillion | ▲ +88.0% |
| 2000 | 0.19x | TL83.78 Trillion | TL434.76 Trillion | — |