Yeni Gimat Gayrimenkul Yatirim Ortakligi AS (YGGYO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.27x

Yeni Gimat Gayrimenkul Yatirim Ortakligi AS (YGGYO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.27x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of TL1.60 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (TL5.98 Billion) in one year. See YGGYO free cash flow debt coverage to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.27x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

TL1.60 Billion
TRY

Total Liabilities

TL5.98 Billion
TRY

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Yeni Gimat Gayrimenkul Yatirim Ortakligi AS Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2013–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Yeni Gimat Gayrimenkul Yatirim Ortakligi AS across 12 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Yeni Gimat Gayrimenkul Yatirim Ortakligi (YGGYO) cash flow conversion.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Yeni Gimat Gayrimenkul Yatirim Ortakligi AS (2013–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Yeni Gimat Gayrimenkul Yatirim Ortakligi AS. Check Yeni Gimat Gayrimenkul Yatirim Ortakligi cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (TRY) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.30x TL1.34 Billion TL4.38 Billion ▼ -93.3%
2023 4.53x TL1.04 Billion TL229.82 Million ▼ -29.8%
2022 6.44x TL606.29 Million TL94.07 Million ▲ +151.3%
2021 2.56x TL172.26 Million TL67.18 Million ▼ -31.0%
2020 3.72x TL116.56 Million TL31.35 Million ▼ -32.0%
2019 5.47x TL188.28 Million TL34.42 Million ▼ -18.2%
2018 6.69x TL178.77 Million TL26.73 Million ▼ -13.3%
2017 7.71x TL151.94 Million TL19.70 Million ▼ -10.7%
2016 8.64x TL158.10 Million TL18.31 Million ▼ -15.7%
2015 10.24x TL122.50 Million TL11.96 Million ▲ +72.3%
2014 5.94x TL87.11 Million TL14.65 Million ▼ -27.6%
2013 8.21x TL74.99 Million TL9.13 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.