PP Properti Tbk PT Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2025: 0.00x

PP Properti Tbk PT cash flow-to-debt ratio. PP Properti Tbk PT (PPRO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of Rp5.28 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (Rp8.01 Trillion) in one year. Check PP Properti Tbk PT earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.00x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

Rp5.28 Billion
IDR

Total Liabilities

Rp8.01 Trillion
IDR

Data as of

Jun 2025
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of PP Properti Tbk PT (2013–2024)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of PP Properti Tbk PT from 2013 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for PP Properti Tbk PT across 12 annual periods. Check PPRO total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

PP Properti Tbk PT Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2013–2024)

PP Properti Tbk PT cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2013 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for PP Properti Tbk PT. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see PP Properti Tbk PT (PPRO) cash flow conversion.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (IDR) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 -0.05x Rp-866.56 Billion Rp16.05 Trillion ▼ -871.6%
2023 -0.01x Rp-91.20 Billion Rp16.41 Trillion ▼ -567.9%
2022 0.00x Rp20.50 Billion Rp17.26 Trillion ▲ +120.1%
2021 -0.01x Rp-98.11 Billion Rp16.59 Trillion ▲ +82.4%
2020 -0.03x Rp-472.43 Billion Rp14.04 Trillion ▼ -144.6%
2019 -0.01x Rp-185.11 Billion Rp13.46 Trillion ▼ -303.7%
2018 0.01x Rp71.96 Billion Rp10.66 Trillion ▲ +108.4%
2017 0.00x Rp24.50 Billion Rp7.56 Trillion ▲ +110.3%
2016 -0.03x Rp-184.96 Billion Rp5.86 Trillion ▼ -525.8%
2015 0.01x Rp20.77 Billion Rp2.80 Trillion ▲ +2379.5%
2014 0.00x Rp520.41 Million Rp1.74 Trillion ▼ -99.6%
2013 0.08x Rp41.40 Billion Rp512.28 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.