Randgold Exploration (RNG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Randgold Exploration (RNG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ZAC-6.45K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (ZAC10.99 Million) in one year. Explore RNG long-term investments to assets to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Randgold Exploration Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Randgold Exploration across 28 annual periods. Also explore RNG total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Randgold Exploration (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Randgold Exploration. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see RNG market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (ZAC) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.07x | ZAC669.00K | ZAC9.76 Million | ▲ +103.1% |
| 2023 | -2.23x | ZAC-23.70 Million | ZAC10.61 Million | ▼ -2995.8% |
| 2022 | -0.07x | ZAC-847.00K | ZAC11.74 Million | ▼ -218.7% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | ZAC699.00K | ZAC11.50 Million | ▲ +103.9% |
| 2020 | -1.58x | ZAC-18.07 Million | ZAC11.47 Million | ▲ +26.3% |
| 2019 | -2.14x | ZAC-27.18 Million | ZAC12.71 Million | ▼ -10003.1% |
| 2018 | -0.02x | ZAC-270.00K | ZAC12.76 Million | ▲ +98.5% |
| 2017 | -1.38x | ZAC-19.21 Million | ZAC13.96 Million | ▼ -279.5% |
| 2016 | -0.36x | ZAC-6.20 Million | ZAC17.09 Million | ▼ -440.1% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | ZAC1.50 Million | ZAC14.11 Million | ▼ -98.8% |
| 2014 | 8.99x | ZAC135.18 Million | ZAC15.04 Million | ▲ +1148.9% |
| 2013 | -0.86x | ZAC-15.06 Million | ZAC17.57 Million | ▼ -4409.6% |
| 2012 | -0.02x | ZAC-800.00K | ZAC42.09 Million | ▲ +96.8% |
| 2011 | -0.60x | ZAC-27.00 Million | ZAC44.97 Million | ▼ -833.7% |
| 2010 | -0.06x | ZAC-25.38 Million | ZAC394.62 Million | ▲ +90.8% |
| 2009 | -0.70x | ZAC-43.11 Million | ZAC61.60 Million | ▲ +57.0% |
| 2008 | -1.63x | ZAC-102.06 Million | ZAC62.72 Million | ▼ -808.4% |
| 2007 | 0.23x | ZAC31.00 Million | ZAC134.94 Million | ▼ -17.3% |
| 2006 | 0.28x | ZAC19.93 Million | ZAC71.79 Million | ▲ +3282.8% |
| 2005 | -0.01x | ZAC-9.89 Million | ZAC1.13 Billion | ▼ -71.0% |
| 2003 | -0.01x | ZAC-246.00K | ZAC48.24 Million | ▲ +99.1% |
| 2002 | -0.59x | ZAC-9.62 Million | ZAC16.32 Million | ▼ -346.7% |
| 2001 | 0.24x | ZAC254.50 Million | ZAC1.07 Billion | ▲ +221.6% |
| 2000 | -0.20x | ZAC-243.43 Million | ZAC1.24 Billion | ▼ -184.2% |
| 1999 | 0.23x | ZAC291.50 Million | ZAC1.25 Billion | ▲ +158.2% |
| 1998 | -0.40x | ZAC-322.86 Million | ZAC805.29 Million | ▼ -92.8% |
| 1997 | -0.21x | ZAC-124.46 Million | ZAC598.62 Million | ▼ -608.0% |
| 1996 | 0.04x | ZAC37.57 Million | ZAC918.14 Million | — |