Randgold Exploration Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Randgold Exploration cash flow-to-debt ratio. Randgold Exploration (RNG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ZAC-6.45K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (ZAC10.99 Million) in one year. Check RNG operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Randgold Exploration (1996–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Randgold Exploration from 1996 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Randgold Exploration across 28 annual periods. Check Randgold Exploration (RNG) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Randgold Exploration Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2024)
Randgold Exploration cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Randgold Exploration. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Randgold Exploration.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (ZAC) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.07x | ZAC669.00K | ZAC9.76 Million | ▲ +103.1% |
| 2023 | -2.23x | ZAC-23.70 Million | ZAC10.61 Million | ▼ -2995.8% |
| 2022 | -0.07x | ZAC-847.00K | ZAC11.74 Million | ▼ -218.7% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | ZAC699.00K | ZAC11.50 Million | ▲ +103.9% |
| 2020 | -1.58x | ZAC-18.07 Million | ZAC11.47 Million | ▲ +26.3% |
| 2019 | -2.14x | ZAC-27.18 Million | ZAC12.71 Million | ▼ -10003.1% |
| 2018 | -0.02x | ZAC-270.00K | ZAC12.76 Million | ▲ +98.5% |
| 2017 | -1.38x | ZAC-19.21 Million | ZAC13.96 Million | ▼ -279.5% |
| 2016 | -0.36x | ZAC-6.20 Million | ZAC17.09 Million | ▼ -440.1% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | ZAC1.50 Million | ZAC14.11 Million | ▼ -98.8% |
| 2014 | 8.99x | ZAC135.18 Million | ZAC15.04 Million | ▲ +1148.9% |
| 2013 | -0.86x | ZAC-15.06 Million | ZAC17.57 Million | ▼ -4409.6% |
| 2012 | -0.02x | ZAC-800.00K | ZAC42.09 Million | ▲ +96.8% |
| 2011 | -0.60x | ZAC-27.00 Million | ZAC44.97 Million | ▼ -833.7% |
| 2010 | -0.06x | ZAC-25.38 Million | ZAC394.62 Million | ▲ +90.8% |
| 2009 | -0.70x | ZAC-43.11 Million | ZAC61.60 Million | ▲ +57.0% |
| 2008 | -1.63x | ZAC-102.06 Million | ZAC62.72 Million | ▼ -808.4% |
| 2007 | 0.23x | ZAC31.00 Million | ZAC134.94 Million | ▼ -17.3% |
| 2006 | 0.28x | ZAC19.93 Million | ZAC71.79 Million | ▲ +3282.8% |
| 2005 | -0.01x | ZAC-9.89 Million | ZAC1.13 Billion | ▼ -71.0% |
| 2003 | -0.01x | ZAC-246.00K | ZAC48.24 Million | ▲ +99.1% |
| 2002 | -0.59x | ZAC-9.62 Million | ZAC16.32 Million | ▼ -346.7% |
| 2001 | 0.24x | ZAC254.50 Million | ZAC1.07 Billion | ▲ +221.6% |
| 2000 | -0.20x | ZAC-243.43 Million | ZAC1.24 Billion | ▼ -184.2% |
| 1999 | 0.23x | ZAC291.50 Million | ZAC1.25 Billion | ▲ +158.2% |
| 1998 | -0.40x | ZAC-322.86 Million | ZAC805.29 Million | ▼ -92.8% |
| 1997 | -0.21x | ZAC-124.46 Million | ZAC598.62 Million | ▼ -608.0% |
| 1996 | 0.04x | ZAC37.57 Million | ZAC918.14 Million | — |