Randgold Exploration (RNG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Randgold Exploration (RNG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ZAC-6.45K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (ZAC10.99 Million) in one year. See RNG FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Randgold Exploration Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Randgold Exploration across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Randgold Exploration.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Randgold Exploration (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Randgold Exploration. Check RNG cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (ZAC) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.07x | ZAC669.00K | ZAC9.76 Million | ▲ +103.1% |
| 2023 | -2.23x | ZAC-23.70 Million | ZAC10.61 Million | ▼ -2995.8% |
| 2022 | -0.07x | ZAC-847.00K | ZAC11.74 Million | ▼ -218.7% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | ZAC699.00K | ZAC11.50 Million | ▲ +103.9% |
| 2020 | -1.58x | ZAC-18.07 Million | ZAC11.47 Million | ▲ +26.3% |
| 2019 | -2.14x | ZAC-27.18 Million | ZAC12.71 Million | ▼ -10003.1% |
| 2018 | -0.02x | ZAC-270.00K | ZAC12.76 Million | ▲ +98.5% |
| 2017 | -1.38x | ZAC-19.21 Million | ZAC13.96 Million | ▼ -279.5% |
| 2016 | -0.36x | ZAC-6.20 Million | ZAC17.09 Million | ▼ -440.1% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | ZAC1.50 Million | ZAC14.11 Million | ▼ -98.8% |
| 2014 | 8.99x | ZAC135.18 Million | ZAC15.04 Million | ▲ +1148.9% |
| 2013 | -0.86x | ZAC-15.06 Million | ZAC17.57 Million | ▼ -4409.6% |
| 2012 | -0.02x | ZAC-800.00K | ZAC42.09 Million | ▲ +96.8% |
| 2011 | -0.60x | ZAC-27.00 Million | ZAC44.97 Million | ▼ -833.7% |
| 2010 | -0.06x | ZAC-25.38 Million | ZAC394.62 Million | ▲ +90.8% |
| 2009 | -0.70x | ZAC-43.11 Million | ZAC61.60 Million | ▲ +57.0% |
| 2008 | -1.63x | ZAC-102.06 Million | ZAC62.72 Million | ▼ -808.4% |
| 2007 | 0.23x | ZAC31.00 Million | ZAC134.94 Million | ▼ -17.3% |
| 2006 | 0.28x | ZAC19.93 Million | ZAC71.79 Million | ▲ +3282.8% |
| 2005 | -0.01x | ZAC-9.89 Million | ZAC1.13 Billion | ▼ -71.0% |
| 2003 | -0.01x | ZAC-246.00K | ZAC48.24 Million | ▲ +99.1% |
| 2002 | -0.59x | ZAC-9.62 Million | ZAC16.32 Million | ▼ -346.7% |
| 2001 | 0.24x | ZAC254.50 Million | ZAC1.07 Billion | ▲ +221.6% |
| 2000 | -0.20x | ZAC-243.43 Million | ZAC1.24 Billion | ▼ -184.2% |
| 1999 | 0.23x | ZAC291.50 Million | ZAC1.25 Billion | ▲ +158.2% |
| 1998 | -0.40x | ZAC-322.86 Million | ZAC805.29 Million | ▼ -92.8% |
| 1997 | -0.21x | ZAC-124.46 Million | ZAC598.62 Million | ▼ -608.0% |
| 1996 | 0.04x | ZAC37.57 Million | ZAC918.14 Million | — |