Olympia Industries Bhd (3018) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: -0.02x

Olympia Industries Bhd (3018) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of RM-3.67 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (RM243.04 Million) in one year. See Olympia Industries Bhd free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.02x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

RM-3.67 Million
MYR

Total Liabilities

RM243.04 Million
MYR

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

Olympia Industries Bhd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2012–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Olympia Industries Bhd across 14 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Olympia Industries Bhd growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Olympia Industries Bhd (2012–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Olympia Industries Bhd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Olympia Industries Bhd market cap and net worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (MYR) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 -0.02x RM-3.67 Million RM243.04 Million ▼ -167.8%
2024 0.02x RM5.28 Million RM237.32 Million ▲ +239.1%
2023 -0.02x RM-3.43 Million RM214.43 Million ▼ -148.0%
2022 0.03x RM6.78 Million RM203.58 Million ▲ +195.3%
2021 -0.03x RM-7.70 Million RM220.32 Million ▼ -344.8%
2020 -0.01x RM-1.78 Million RM226.21 Million ▼ -108.1%
2019 0.10x RM22.65 Million RM232.46 Million ▲ +486.4%
2018 -0.03x RM-5.57 Million RM220.67 Million ▲ +30.3%
2017 -0.04x RM-11.98 Million RM331.24 Million ▼ -148.4%
2016 0.07x RM28.74 Million RM384.97 Million ▲ +1013.4%
2015 -0.01x RM-3.00 Million RM367.00 Million ▼ -201.4%
2014 0.01x RM3.00 Million RM372.00 Million ▼ -81.9%
2013 0.04x RM14.00 Million RM314.00 Million ▼ -32.9%
2012 0.07x RM24.00 Million RM361.00 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.