Jentayu Sustainables Bhd (5673) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: -0.13x

Jentayu Sustainables Bhd (5673) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.13x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of RM-8.04 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (RM63.70 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Jentayu Sustainables Bhd to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.13x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

RM-8.04 Million
MYR

Total Liabilities

RM63.70 Million
MYR

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

Jentayu Sustainables Bhd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2011–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Jentayu Sustainables Bhd across 14 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Jentayu Sustainables Bhd.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Jentayu Sustainables Bhd (2011–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Jentayu Sustainables Bhd. Check Jentayu Sustainables Bhd cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (MYR) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 -0.10x RM-6.07 Million RM59.96 Million ▲ +52.3%
2023 -0.21x RM-13.81 Million RM65.16 Million ▼ -5.3%
2022 -0.20x RM-14.87 Million RM73.87 Million ▲ +52.1%
2021 -0.42x RM-26.25 Million RM62.43 Million ▲ +19.6%
2020 -0.52x RM-32.66 Million RM62.48 Million ▼ -461.2%
2019 -0.09x RM-8.07 Million RM86.69 Million ▼ -236.6%
2018 -0.03x RM-3.68 Million RM132.94 Million ▼ -151.8%
2017 -0.01x RM-1.82 Million RM165.70 Million ▲ +72.1%
2016 -0.04x RM-8.06 Million RM204.70 Million ▼ -35.7%
2015 -0.03x RM-5.96 Million RM205.04 Million ▼ -269.2%
2014 0.02x RM4.00 Million RM233.00 Million ▲ +1.3%
2013 0.02x RM4.00 Million RM236.00 Million ▲ +120.9%
2012 -0.08x RM-19.00 Million RM234.00 Million ▼ -3.0%
2011 -0.08x RM-16.00 Million RM203.00 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.