Farlim Group (Malaysia) Bhd (6041) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: 0.60x

Farlim Group (Malaysia) Bhd (6041) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.60x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of RM26.41 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities (RM44.15 Million) in one year. See Farlim Group (Malaysia) Bhd free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.60x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

RM26.41 Million
MYR

Total Liabilities

RM44.15 Million
MYR

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

Farlim Group (Malaysia) Bhd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2012–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Farlim Group (Malaysia) Bhd across 14 annual periods. Also explore 6041 net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Farlim Group (Malaysia) Bhd (2012–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Farlim Group (Malaysia) Bhd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Farlim Group (Malaysia) Bhd worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (MYR) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.71x RM26.41 Million RM37.21 Million ▲ +326.8%
2024 -0.31x RM-8.03 Million RM25.64 Million ▲ +66.6%
2023 -0.94x RM-21.03 Million RM22.44 Million ▼ -1342.5%
2022 0.08x RM1.65 Million RM21.87 Million ▲ +113.6%
2021 -0.55x RM-6.52 Million RM11.80 Million ▲ +47.7%
2020 -1.06x RM-13.17 Million RM12.46 Million ▲ +48.2%
2019 -2.04x RM-23.36 Million RM11.44 Million ▼ -127.6%
2018 -0.90x RM-12.01 Million RM13.40 Million ▼ -19.8%
2017 -0.75x RM-10.83 Million RM14.46 Million ▼ -227.8%
2016 0.59x RM9.75 Million RM16.65 Million ▲ +168.9%
2015 -0.85x RM-17.00 Million RM20.00 Million ▼ -19.0%
2014 -0.71x RM-15.00 Million RM21.00 Million ▼ -314.3%
2013 0.33x RM10.00 Million RM30.00 Million ▼ -16.7%
2012 0.40x RM12.00 Million RM30.00 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.