Pesona Metro Holdings Bhd (8311) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: 0.00x

Pesona Metro Holdings Bhd (8311) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of RM2.55 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (RM727.28 Million) in one year. See Pesona Metro Holdings Bhd free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.00x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

RM2.55 Million
MYR

Total Liabilities

RM727.28 Million
MYR

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

Pesona Metro Holdings Bhd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2012–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Pesona Metro Holdings Bhd across 14 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Pesona Metro Holdings Bhd growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Pesona Metro Holdings Bhd (2012–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Pesona Metro Holdings Bhd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Pesona Metro Holdings Bhd worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (MYR) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.00x RM2.55 Million RM727.28 Million ▼ -94.7%
2024 0.07x RM38.83 Million RM583.30 Million ▲ +189.6%
2023 0.02x RM11.43 Million RM497.35 Million ▼ -75.7%
2022 0.09x RM39.93 Million RM422.21 Million ▲ +141.1%
2021 0.04x RM19.96 Million RM508.86 Million ▼ -46.7%
2020 0.07x RM40.18 Million RM545.69 Million ▲ +640.1%
2019 -0.01x RM-7.06 Million RM517.45 Million ▼ -252.3%
2018 0.01x RM3.49 Million RM390.09 Million ▲ +158.1%
2017 -0.02x RM-5.45 Million RM353.38 Million ▼ -111.1%
2016 0.14x RM28.58 Million RM205.21 Million ▲ +145.5%
2015 -0.31x RM-45.00 Million RM147.00 Million ▼ -141.1%
2014 -0.13x RM-16.00 Million RM126.00 Million ▼ -141.6%
2013 0.31x RM29.00 Million RM95.00 Million ▼ -5.6%
2012 0.32x RM22.00 Million RM68.00 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.