GRIT Real Estate Income Group (GR1T) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2024: 0.03x

GRIT Real Estate Income Group (GR1T) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of December 2024, meaning its operating cash flow of GBX19.81 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (GBX687.63 Million) in one year. Explore GR1T long-term asset investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.03x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

GBX19.81 Million
GBX

Total Liabilities

GBX687.63 Million
GBX

Data as of

Dec 2024
Most recent filing

GRIT Real Estate Income Group Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2012–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for GRIT Real Estate Income Group across 14 annual periods. Also explore GRIT Real Estate Income Group total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for GRIT Real Estate Income Group (2012–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for GRIT Real Estate Income Group. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is GRIT Real Estate Income Group worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (GBX) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.08x GBX56.84 Million GBX738.44 Million ▲ +163.3%
2024 0.03x GBX20.38 Million GBX697.08 Million ▼ -48.4%
2023 0.06x GBX32.55 Million GBX574.07 Million ▲ +185.1%
2022 0.02x GBX11.29 Million GBX567.84 Million ▼ -46.8%
2021 0.04x GBX19.89 Million GBX532.30 Million ▲ +75.7%
2020 0.02x GBX11.66 Million GBX548.43 Million ▼ -55.2%
2019 0.05x GBX22.26 Million GBX469.35 Million ▲ +355.1%
2018 -0.02x GBX-6.99 Million GBX376.12 Million ▲ +56.2%
2017 -0.04x GBX-11.47 Million GBX270.43 Million ▼ -762.1%
2016 0.01x GBX1.16 Million GBX180.46 Million ▲ +105.1%
2015 -0.13x GBX-14.12 Million GBX111.63 Million ▲ +99.5%
2014 -26.73x GBX-400.89K GBX15.00K ▼ -7988.9%
2013 0.34x GBX104.19K GBX307.55K ▲ +8402.5%
2012 0.00x GBX-3.76K GBX921.91K
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.