Liontrust Asset Management Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Liontrust Asset Management cash flow-to-debt ratio. Liontrust Asset Management (LIO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of GBX6.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (GBX216.32 Million) in one year. Check Liontrust Asset Management (LIO) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Liontrust Asset Management (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Liontrust Asset Management from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Liontrust Asset Management across 29 annual periods. Check Liontrust Asset Management total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Liontrust Asset Management Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Liontrust Asset Management cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Liontrust Asset Management. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see LIO cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (GBX) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.10x | GBX20.63 Million | GBX216.32 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | GBX28.21 Million | GBX255.13 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | GBX43.42 Million | GBX284.25 Million | ▲ +256.5% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | GBX12.12 Million | GBX282.75 Million | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | GBX43.64 Million | GBX318.15 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | GBX20.16 Million | GBX195.48 Million | ▼ -39.3% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | GBX17.43 Million | GBX102.50 Million | ▼ -38.3% |
| 2018 | 0.28x | GBX24.57 Million | GBX89.17 Million | ▲ +63.3% |
| 2017 | 0.17x | GBX10.91 Million | GBX64.67 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 2016 | 0.24x | GBX7.88 Million | GBX32.19 Million | ▲ +78.7% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | GBX4.33 Million | GBX31.66 Million | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2014 | 0.20x | GBX7.13 Million | GBX35.31 Million | ▲ +69.8% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | GBX4.35 Million | GBX36.62 Million | ▲ +259.1% |
| 2012 | -0.07x | GBX-1.28 Million | GBX17.16 Million | ▲ +88.7% |
| 2011 | -0.66x | GBX-6.89 Million | GBX10.45 Million | ▲ +1.7% |
| 2010 | -0.67x | GBX-10.13 Million | GBX15.10 Million | ▼ -362.6% |
| 2009 | 0.26x | GBX14.14 Million | GBX55.33 Million | ▲ +112.3% |
| 2008 | 0.12x | GBX6.67 Million | GBX55.41 Million | ▼ -63.5% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | GBX8.17 Million | GBX24.74 Million | ▲ +85.4% |
| 2006 | 0.18x | GBX3.93 Million | GBX22.07 Million | ▼ -40.6% |
| 2005 | 0.30x | GBX12.69 Million | GBX42.31 Million | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2004 | 0.24x | GBX7.38 Million | GBX30.53 Million | ▲ +144.5% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | GBX3.58 Million | GBX36.27 Million | ▲ +169.6% |
| 2002 | -0.14x | GBX-2.53 Million | GBX17.78 Million | ▼ -136.5% |
| 2001 | 0.39x | GBX5.19 Million | GBX13.36 Million | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2000 | 0.46x | GBX4.59 Million | GBX10.07 Million | ▲ +187.8% |
| 1999 | 0.16x | GBX1.50 Million | GBX9.48 Million | ▼ -60.1% |
| 1998 | 0.40x | GBX1.25 Million | GBX3.14 Million | ▲ +181.9% |
| 1997 | -0.48x | GBX-421.00K | GBX869.00K | — |