Marlowe plc (MRL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of March 2025: 0.36x

Marlowe plc (MRL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.36x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of GBX34.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (GBX97.60 Million) in one year. See Marlowe plc free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.36x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

GBX34.80 Million
GBX

Total Liabilities

GBX97.60 Million
GBX

Data as of

Mar 2025
Most recent filing

Marlowe plc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2008–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Marlowe plc across 18 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Marlowe plc growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Marlowe plc (2008–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Marlowe plc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see MRL market cap overview.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (GBX) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.34x GBX33.00 Million GBX97.60 Million ▲ +302.9%
2024 0.08x GBX38.00 Million GBX452.80 Million ▲ +1.9%
2023 0.08x GBX33.60 Million GBX408.10 Million ▲ +230.5%
2022 0.02x GBX8.60 Million GBX345.20 Million ▼ -85.3%
2021 0.17x GBX20.40 Million GBX120.20 Million ▲ +467.1%
2020 0.03x GBX3.40 Million GBX113.60 Million ▲ +170.9%
2019 -0.04x GBX-3.00 Million GBX71.10 Million ▲ +21.5%
2018 -0.05x GBX-1.80 Million GBX33.50 Million ▼ -144.1%
2017 0.12x GBX2.50 Million GBX20.50 Million ▼ -5.5%
2016 0.13x GBX400.00K GBX3.10 Million ▼ -90.3%
2015 1.33x GBX28.00K GBX21.00K ▲ +100.0%
2014 0.67x GBX14.00K GBX21.00K ▼ -78.5%
2013 3.10x GBX62.00K GBX20.00K ▲ +15.5%
2012 2.68x GBX51.00K GBX19.00K ▲ +168.2%
2011 -3.93x GBX-59.00K GBX15.00K ▲ +45.5%
2010 -7.22x GBX-130.00K GBX18.00K ▼ -119.2%
2009 -3.29x GBX-224.00K GBX68.00K ▼ -948.1%
2008 -0.31x GBX-11.00K GBX35.00K
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.