Marlowe plc (MRL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of March 2025: 0.36x

Marlowe plc (MRL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.36x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of GBX34.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (GBX97.60 Million) in one year. Check Marlowe plc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.36x

Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

GBX34.80 Million

GBX

Total Liabilities

GBX97.60 Million

GBX

Data as of

Mar 2025

Most recent filing

Marlowe plc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2008–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Marlowe plc across 18 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Marlowe plc for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Marlowe plc (2008–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Marlowe plc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Marlowe plc.

Year	CF-to-Debt Ratio	Operating CF (GBX)	Total Liabilities	YoY Change
2025	0.34x	GBX33.00 Million	GBX97.60 Million	▲ +302.9%
2024	0.08x	GBX38.00 Million	GBX452.80 Million	▲ +1.9%
2023	0.08x	GBX33.60 Million	GBX408.10 Million	▲ +230.5%
2022	0.02x	GBX8.60 Million	GBX345.20 Million	▼ -85.3%
2021	0.17x	GBX20.40 Million	GBX120.20 Million	▲ +467.1%
2020	0.03x	GBX3.40 Million	GBX113.60 Million	▲ +170.9%
2019	-0.04x	GBX-3.00 Million	GBX71.10 Million	▲ +21.5%
2018	-0.05x	GBX-1.80 Million	GBX33.50 Million	▼ -144.1%
2017	0.12x	GBX2.50 Million	GBX20.50 Million	▼ -5.5%
2016	0.13x	GBX400.00K	GBX3.10 Million	▼ -90.3%
2015	1.33x	GBX28.00K	GBX21.00K	▲ +100.0%
2014	0.67x	GBX14.00K	GBX21.00K	▼ -78.5%
2013	3.10x	GBX62.00K	GBX20.00K	▲ +15.5%
2012	2.68x	GBX51.00K	GBX19.00K	▲ +168.2%
2011	-3.93x	GBX-59.00K	GBX15.00K	▲ +45.5%
2010	-7.22x	GBX-130.00K	GBX18.00K	▼ -119.2%
2009	-3.29x	GBX-224.00K	GBX68.00K	▼ -948.1%
2008	-0.31x	GBX-11.00K	GBX35.00K	—

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.