Transense Technologies PLC Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Transense Technologies PLC cash flow-to-debt ratio. Transense Technologies PLC (TRT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.32x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of GBX400.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (GBX1.24 Million) in one year. Check Transense Technologies PLC earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Transense Technologies PLC (1992–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Transense Technologies PLC from 1992 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Transense Technologies PLC across 34 annual periods. Check Transense Technologies PLC (TRT) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Transense Technologies PLC Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1992–2025)
Transense Technologies PLC cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1992 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Transense Technologies PLC. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Transense Technologies PLC generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (GBX) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.74x | GBX2.05 Million | GBX1.17 Million | ▲ +0.1% |
| 2024 | 1.74x | GBX1.56 Million | GBX897.00K | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2023 | 1.76x | GBX652.00K | GBX370.00K | ▲ +188.1% |
| 2022 | 0.61x | GBX408.00K | GBX667.00K | ▲ +202.1% |
| 2021 | -0.60x | GBX-257.00K | GBX429.00K | ▲ +33.6% |
| 2020 | -0.90x | GBX-1.86 Million | GBX2.06 Million | ▼ -54.1% |
| 2019 | -0.59x | GBX-427.00K | GBX729.00K | ▲ +74.5% |
| 2018 | -2.29x | GBX-1.11 Million | GBX482.00K | ▼ -72.2% |
| 2017 | -1.33x | GBX-877.00K | GBX658.00K | ▼ -212.5% |
| 2016 | 1.19x | GBX839.00K | GBX708.00K | ▲ +130.1% |
| 2015 | -3.94x | GBX-2.15 Million | GBX545.00K | ▲ +6.5% |
| 2014 | -4.21x | GBX-2.87 Million | GBX682.00K | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2013 | -3.77x | GBX-2.03 Million | GBX539.00K | ▲ +63.8% |
| 2012 | -10.43x | GBX-2.99 Million | GBX287.00K | ▼ -128.0% |
| 2011 | -4.58x | GBX-1.76 Million | GBX384.00K | ▼ -26.8% |
| 2010 | -3.61x | GBX-1.41 Million | GBX390.00K | ▼ -77.3% |
| 2009 | -2.03x | GBX-1.06 Million | GBX523.00K | ▲ +77.6% |
| 2008 | -9.08x | GBX-2.12 Million | GBX234.00K | ▼ -1194.7% |
| 2007 | -0.70x | GBX-856.00K | GBX1.22 Million | ▲ +75.7% |
| 2006 | -2.88x | GBX-830.00K | GBX288.00K | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2005 | -2.62x | GBX-754.00K | GBX288.00K | ▲ +31.5% |
| 2004 | -3.82x | GBX-925.00K | GBX242.00K | ▲ +54.4% |
| 2003 | -8.38x | GBX-938.00K | GBX112.00K | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2002 | -5.58x | GBX-976.00K | GBX175.00K | ▲ +62.4% |
| 2001 | -14.83x | GBX-1.05 Million | GBX71.00K | ▼ -122.7% |
| 2000 | -6.66x | GBX-979.00K | GBX147.00K | ▼ -2110.4% |
| 1999 | -0.30x | GBX-185.00K | GBX614.00K | ▲ +48.7% |
| 1998 | -0.59x | GBX-141.00K | GBX240.00K | ▲ +32.8% |
| 1997 | -0.87x | GBX-83.00K | GBX95.00K | ▲ +87.3% |
| 1996 | -6.88x | GBX-55.00K | GBX8.00K | ▲ +22.9% |
| 1995 | -8.92x | GBX-107.00K | GBX12.00K | ▼ -67.2% |
| 1994 | -5.33x | GBX-144.00K | GBX27.00K | ▼ -915.7% |
| 1993 | 0.65x | GBX85.00K | GBX130.00K | ▲ +163.0% |
| 1992 | -1.04x | GBX-55.00K | GBX53.00K | — |