Transense Technologies PLC (TRT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Transense Technologies PLC (TRT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.32x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of GBX400.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (GBX1.24 Million) in one year. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Transense Technologies PLC to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Transense Technologies PLC Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Transense Technologies PLC across 34 annual periods. Also explore Transense Technologies PLC asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Transense Technologies PLC (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Transense Technologies PLC. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Transense Technologies PLC market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (GBX) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.74x | GBX2.05 Million | GBX1.17 Million | ▲ +0.1% |
| 2024 | 1.74x | GBX1.56 Million | GBX897.00K | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2023 | 1.76x | GBX652.00K | GBX370.00K | ▲ +188.1% |
| 2022 | 0.61x | GBX408.00K | GBX667.00K | ▲ +202.1% |
| 2021 | -0.60x | GBX-257.00K | GBX429.00K | ▲ +33.6% |
| 2020 | -0.90x | GBX-1.86 Million | GBX2.06 Million | ▼ -54.1% |
| 2019 | -0.59x | GBX-427.00K | GBX729.00K | ▲ +74.5% |
| 2018 | -2.29x | GBX-1.11 Million | GBX482.00K | ▼ -72.2% |
| 2017 | -1.33x | GBX-877.00K | GBX658.00K | ▼ -212.5% |
| 2016 | 1.19x | GBX839.00K | GBX708.00K | ▲ +130.1% |
| 2015 | -3.94x | GBX-2.15 Million | GBX545.00K | ▲ +6.5% |
| 2014 | -4.21x | GBX-2.87 Million | GBX682.00K | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2013 | -3.77x | GBX-2.03 Million | GBX539.00K | ▲ +63.8% |
| 2012 | -10.43x | GBX-2.99 Million | GBX287.00K | ▼ -128.0% |
| 2011 | -4.58x | GBX-1.76 Million | GBX384.00K | ▼ -26.8% |
| 2010 | -3.61x | GBX-1.41 Million | GBX390.00K | ▼ -77.3% |
| 2009 | -2.03x | GBX-1.06 Million | GBX523.00K | ▲ +77.6% |
| 2008 | -9.08x | GBX-2.12 Million | GBX234.00K | ▼ -1194.7% |
| 2007 | -0.70x | GBX-856.00K | GBX1.22 Million | ▲ +75.7% |
| 2006 | -2.88x | GBX-830.00K | GBX288.00K | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2005 | -2.62x | GBX-754.00K | GBX288.00K | ▲ +31.5% |
| 2004 | -3.82x | GBX-925.00K | GBX242.00K | ▲ +54.4% |
| 2003 | -8.38x | GBX-938.00K | GBX112.00K | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2002 | -5.58x | GBX-976.00K | GBX175.00K | ▲ +62.4% |
| 2001 | -14.83x | GBX-1.05 Million | GBX71.00K | ▼ -122.7% |
| 2000 | -6.66x | GBX-979.00K | GBX147.00K | ▼ -2110.4% |
| 1999 | -0.30x | GBX-185.00K | GBX614.00K | ▲ +48.7% |
| 1998 | -0.59x | GBX-141.00K | GBX240.00K | ▲ +32.8% |
| 1997 | -0.87x | GBX-83.00K | GBX95.00K | ▲ +87.3% |
| 1996 | -6.88x | GBX-55.00K | GBX8.00K | ▲ +22.9% |
| 1995 | -8.92x | GBX-107.00K | GBX12.00K | ▼ -67.2% |
| 1994 | -5.33x | GBX-144.00K | GBX27.00K | ▼ -915.7% |
| 1993 | 0.65x | GBX85.00K | GBX130.00K | ▲ +163.0% |
| 1992 | -1.04x | GBX-55.00K | GBX53.00K | — |