Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.16x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.85 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($18.25 Million) in one year. Explore Aehr Test Systems long-term investment allocation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Aehr Test Systems Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Aehr Test Systems across 29 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Aehr Test Systems for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Aehr Test Systems (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Aehr Test Systems. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.29x | $-7.40 Million | $25.64 Million | ▼ -368.2% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | $1.76 Million | $16.32 Million | ▼ -75.8% |
| 2023 | 0.44x | $10.01 Million | $22.54 Million | ▲ +233.9% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | $1.51 Million | $11.34 Million | ▲ +150.3% |
| 2021 | -0.26x | $-2.70 Million | $10.22 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2020 | -0.31x | $-2.02 Million | $6.52 Million | ▲ +67.8% |
| 2019 | -0.96x | $-5.64 Million | $5.85 Million | ▼ -731.8% |
| 2018 | -0.12x | $-1.35 Million | $11.67 Million | ▲ +63.7% |
| 2017 | -0.32x | $-4.50 Million | $14.10 Million | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2016 | -0.58x | $-6.28 Million | $10.77 Million | ▼ -166.8% |
| 2015 | -0.22x | $-2.26 Million | $10.32 Million | ▼ -87.2% |
| 2014 | -0.12x | $-607.00K | $5.20 Million | ▼ -125.4% |
| 2013 | -0.05x | $-310.00K | $5.98 Million | ▲ +94.5% |
| 2012 | -0.94x | $-4.88 Million | $5.16 Million | ▲ +32.0% |
| 2011 | -1.39x | $-4.14 Million | $2.98 Million | ▼ -236.6% |
| 2010 | 1.02x | $3.25 Million | $3.19 Million | ▲ +136.4% |
| 2009 | -2.80x | $-11.04 Million | $3.95 Million | ▼ -672.9% |
| 2008 | 0.49x | $3.62 Million | $7.43 Million | ▲ +364.3% |
| 2007 | -0.18x | $-1.11 Million | $6.01 Million | ▼ -174.7% |
| 2006 | 0.25x | $1.50 Million | $6.08 Million | ▲ +139.0% |
| 2005 | -0.63x | $-2.54 Million | $4.02 Million | ▼ -264.6% |
| 2004 | -0.17x | $-800.00K | $4.61 Million | ▲ +86.8% |
| 2003 | -1.31x | $-3.81 Million | $2.90 Million | ▼ -2187.8% |
| 2002 | -0.06x | $-226.00K | $3.93 Million | ▼ -127.2% |
| 2001 | 0.21x | $1.01 Million | $4.79 Million | ▲ +122.8% |
| 2000 | -0.93x | $-5.96 Million | $6.42 Million | ▼ -1322.4% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $342.00K | $4.51 Million | ▲ +181.6% |
| 1998 | -0.09x | $-664.00K | $7.14 Million | ▼ -144.3% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $3.00 Million | $14.30 Million | — |