Aehr Test Systems Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Aehr Test Systems cash flow-to-debt ratio. Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of May 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.21 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($27.18 Million) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Aehr Test Systems to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Aehr Test Systems (1997–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Aehr Test Systems from 1997 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Aehr Test Systems across 30 annual periods. Check Aehr Test Systems investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Aehr Test Systems Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2026)
Aehr Test Systems cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Aehr Test Systems. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Aehr Test Systems cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -0.12x | $-3.31 Million | $27.18 Million | ▲ +57.8% |
| 2025 | -0.29x | $-7.40 Million | $25.64 Million | ▼ -368.2% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | $1.76 Million | $16.32 Million | ▼ -75.8% |
| 2023 | 0.44x | $10.01 Million | $22.54 Million | ▲ +233.9% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | $1.51 Million | $11.34 Million | ▲ +150.3% |
| 2021 | -0.26x | $-2.70 Million | $10.22 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2020 | -0.31x | $-2.02 Million | $6.52 Million | ▲ +67.8% |
| 2019 | -0.96x | $-5.64 Million | $5.85 Million | ▼ -731.8% |
| 2018 | -0.12x | $-1.35 Million | $11.67 Million | ▲ +63.7% |
| 2017 | -0.32x | $-4.50 Million | $14.10 Million | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2016 | -0.58x | $-6.28 Million | $10.77 Million | ▼ -166.8% |
| 2015 | -0.22x | $-2.26 Million | $10.32 Million | ▼ -87.2% |
| 2014 | -0.12x | $-607.00K | $5.20 Million | ▼ -125.4% |
| 2013 | -0.05x | $-310.00K | $5.98 Million | ▲ +94.5% |
| 2012 | -0.94x | $-4.88 Million | $5.16 Million | ▲ +32.0% |
| 2011 | -1.39x | $-4.14 Million | $2.98 Million | ▼ -236.6% |
| 2010 | 1.02x | $3.25 Million | $3.19 Million | ▲ +136.4% |
| 2009 | -2.80x | $-11.04 Million | $3.95 Million | ▼ -672.9% |
| 2008 | 0.49x | $3.62 Million | $7.43 Million | ▲ +364.3% |
| 2007 | -0.18x | $-1.11 Million | $6.01 Million | ▼ -174.7% |
| 2006 | 0.25x | $1.50 Million | $6.08 Million | ▲ +139.0% |
| 2005 | -0.63x | $-2.54 Million | $4.02 Million | ▼ -264.6% |
| 2004 | -0.17x | $-800.00K | $4.61 Million | ▲ +86.8% |
| 2003 | -1.31x | $-3.81 Million | $2.90 Million | ▼ -2187.8% |
| 2002 | -0.06x | $-226.00K | $3.93 Million | ▼ -127.2% |
| 2001 | 0.21x | $1.01 Million | $4.79 Million | ▲ +122.8% |
| 2000 | -0.93x | $-5.96 Million | $6.42 Million | ▼ -1322.4% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $342.00K | $4.51 Million | ▲ +181.6% |
| 1998 | -0.09x | $-664.00K | $7.14 Million | ▼ -144.3% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $3.00 Million | $14.30 Million | — |