Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.16x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.85 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($18.25 Million) in one year. See Aehr Test Systems free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Aehr Test Systems Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Aehr Test Systems across 29 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Aehr Test Systems to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Aehr Test Systems (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Aehr Test Systems. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see AEHR company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.29x | $-7.40 Million | $25.64 Million | ▼ -368.2% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | $1.76 Million | $16.32 Million | ▼ -75.8% |
| 2023 | 0.44x | $10.01 Million | $22.54 Million | ▲ +233.9% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | $1.51 Million | $11.34 Million | ▲ +150.3% |
| 2021 | -0.26x | $-2.70 Million | $10.22 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2020 | -0.31x | $-2.02 Million | $6.52 Million | ▲ +67.8% |
| 2019 | -0.96x | $-5.64 Million | $5.85 Million | ▼ -731.8% |
| 2018 | -0.12x | $-1.35 Million | $11.67 Million | ▲ +63.7% |
| 2017 | -0.32x | $-4.50 Million | $14.10 Million | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2016 | -0.58x | $-6.28 Million | $10.77 Million | ▼ -166.8% |
| 2015 | -0.22x | $-2.26 Million | $10.32 Million | ▼ -87.2% |
| 2014 | -0.12x | $-607.00K | $5.20 Million | ▼ -125.4% |
| 2013 | -0.05x | $-310.00K | $5.98 Million | ▲ +94.5% |
| 2012 | -0.94x | $-4.88 Million | $5.16 Million | ▲ +32.0% |
| 2011 | -1.39x | $-4.14 Million | $2.98 Million | ▼ -236.6% |
| 2010 | 1.02x | $3.25 Million | $3.19 Million | ▲ +136.4% |
| 2009 | -2.80x | $-11.04 Million | $3.95 Million | ▼ -672.9% |
| 2008 | 0.49x | $3.62 Million | $7.43 Million | ▲ +364.3% |
| 2007 | -0.18x | $-1.11 Million | $6.01 Million | ▼ -174.7% |
| 2006 | 0.25x | $1.50 Million | $6.08 Million | ▲ +139.0% |
| 2005 | -0.63x | $-2.54 Million | $4.02 Million | ▼ -264.6% |
| 2004 | -0.17x | $-800.00K | $4.61 Million | ▲ +86.8% |
| 2003 | -1.31x | $-3.81 Million | $2.90 Million | ▼ -2187.8% |
| 2002 | -0.06x | $-226.00K | $3.93 Million | ▼ -127.2% |
| 2001 | 0.21x | $1.01 Million | $4.79 Million | ▲ +122.8% |
| 2000 | -0.93x | $-5.96 Million | $6.42 Million | ▼ -1322.4% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $342.00K | $4.51 Million | ▲ +181.6% |
| 1998 | -0.09x | $-664.00K | $7.14 Million | ▼ -144.3% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $3.00 Million | $14.30 Million | — |