Advanced Energy Industries Inc (AEIS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Advanced Energy Industries Inc (AEIS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-6.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.21 Billion) in one year. See cash generation quality of Advanced Energy Industries Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Advanced Energy Industries Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Advanced Energy Industries Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore AEIS net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Advanced Energy Industries Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Advanced Energy Industries Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Advanced Energy Industries Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $233.30 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +59.7% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | $130.75 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $208.94 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▼ -25.4% |
| 2022 | 0.20x | $183.59 Million | $925.90 Million | ▲ +33.7% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | $140.25 Million | $945.84 Million | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2020 | 0.24x | $201.24 Million | $832.32 Million | ▲ +327.2% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $48.39 Million | $855.15 Million | ▼ -92.2% |
| 2018 | 0.72x | $151.27 Million | $209.18 Million | ▼ -15.8% |
| 2017 | 0.86x | $182.70 Million | $212.67 Million | ▲ +29.9% |
| 2016 | 0.66x | $118.66 Million | $179.46 Million | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2015 | 0.50x | $104.81 Million | $208.18 Million | ▲ +39.6% |
| 2014 | 0.36x | $75.59 Million | $209.60 Million | ▲ +92.5% |
| 2013 | 0.19x | $35.32 Million | $188.51 Million | ▼ -74.5% |
| 2012 | 0.74x | $110.78 Million | $150.53 Million | ▲ +143.5% |
| 2011 | 0.30x | $38.09 Million | $126.04 Million | ▲ +116.2% |
| 2010 | 0.14x | $18.34 Million | $131.19 Million | ▲ +1.6% |
| 2009 | 0.14x | $9.19 Million | $66.79 Million | ▼ -74.8% |
| 2008 | 0.55x | $24.08 Million | $44.09 Million | ▼ -54.1% |
| 2007 | 1.19x | $61.81 Million | $51.97 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2006 | 1.57x | $88.31 Million | $56.11 Million | ▲ +130.0% |
| 2005 | 0.68x | $36.05 Million | $52.69 Million | ▲ +1609.4% |
| 2004 | -0.05x | $-11.38 Million | $251.00 Million | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2003 | -0.05x | $-12.99 Million | $262.90 Million | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2002 | -0.06x | $-15.30 Million | $272.39 Million | ▼ -268.5% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | $7.86 Million | $235.85 Million | ▼ -81.4% |
| 2000 | 0.18x | $22.75 Million | $126.89 Million | ▲ +190.9% |
| 1999 | 0.06x | $10.10 Million | $163.91 Million | ▼ -91.6% |
| 1998 | 0.73x | $8.72 Million | $11.90 Million | ▲ +125.5% |
| 1997 | 0.33x | $8.09 Million | $24.89 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 1996 | 0.34x | $3.25 Million | $9.54 Million | ▲ +30.9% |
| 1995 | 0.26x | $3.70 Million | $14.20 Million | — |