Aethlon Medical Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Aethlon Medical Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Aethlon Medical Inc (AEMD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1830.56x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.90 Billion could theoretically repay -1831% of its total liabilities ($1.04 Million) in one year. Check AEMD cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Aethlon Medical Inc (1997–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Aethlon Medical Inc from 1997 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Aethlon Medical Inc across 30 annual periods. Check AEMD capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Aethlon Medical Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2026)
Aethlon Medical Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Aethlon Medical Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Aethlon Medical Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -4.84x | $-7.00 Million | $1.45 Million | ▼ -41.5% |
| 2025 | -3.42x | $-7.65 Million | $2.24 Million | ▲ +16.3% |
| 2024 | -4.09x | $-10.13 Million | $2.48 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 2023 | -4.30x | $-10.51 Million | $2.44 Million | ▼ -6.8% |
| 2022 | -4.03x | $-9.77 Million | $2.43 Million | ▲ +18.2% |
| 2021 | -4.92x | $-6.76 Million | $1.38 Million | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2020 | -4.68x | $-5.20 Million | $1.11 Million | ▼ -98.9% |
| 2019 | -2.35x | $-4.29 Million | $1.82 Million | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2018 | -2.96x | $-3.91 Million | $1.32 Million | ▲ +4.4% |
| 2017 | -3.10x | $-3.51 Million | $1.13 Million | ▲ +24.5% |
| 2016 | -4.11x | $-4.33 Million | $1.05 Million | ▲ +40.7% |
| 2015 | -6.92x | $-5.05 Million | $729.21K | ▼ -5217.4% |
| 2014 | -0.13x | $-2.14 Million | $16.43 Million | ▲ +40.2% |
| 2013 | -0.22x | $-2.10 Million | $9.64 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 2012 | -0.18x | $-1.84 Million | $10.13 Million | ▲ +39.6% |
| 2011 | -0.30x | $-1.97 Million | $6.54 Million | ▲ +23.2% |
| 2010 | -0.39x | $-1.98 Million | $5.05 Million | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2009 | -0.43x | $-1.78 Million | $4.15 Million | ▲ +22.4% |
| 2008 | -0.55x | $-2.10 Million | $3.81 Million | ▼ -147.5% |
| 2007 | -0.22x | $-1.72 Million | $7.71 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2006 | -0.57x | $-1.58 Million | $2.79 Million | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2005 | -0.46x | $-1.56 Million | $3.37 Million | ▼ -236.3% |
| 2004 | -0.14x | $-542.06K | $3.94 Million | ▼ -7.7% |
| 2003 | -0.13x | $-514.50K | $4.02 Million | ▲ +59.8% |
| 2002 | -0.32x | $-1.01 Million | $3.17 Million | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2001 | -0.21x | $-800.67K | $3.75 Million | ▲ +36.1% |
| 2000 | -0.33x | $-678.93K | $2.03 Million | ▼ -114.0% |
| 1999 | -0.16x | $-122.75K | $786.57K | ▲ +83.3% |
| 1998 | -0.93x | $-1.85K | $1.98K | ▲ +85.3% |
| 1997 | -6.34x | $-2.22K | $350.00 | — |