Aethlon Medical Inc (AEMD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Aethlon Medical Inc (AEMD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.87 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.34 Billion) in one year. Check Aethlon Medical Inc (AEMD) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Aethlon Medical Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Aethlon Medical Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore Aethlon Medical Inc (AEMD) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Aethlon Medical Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Aethlon Medical Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Aethlon Medical Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -3.42x | $-7.65 Million | $2.24 Million | ▲ +16.3% |
| 2024 | -4.09x | $-10.13 Million | $2.48 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 2023 | -4.30x | $-10.51 Million | $2.44 Million | ▼ -6.8% |
| 2022 | -4.03x | $-9.77 Million | $2.43 Million | ▲ +18.2% |
| 2021 | -4.92x | $-6.76 Million | $1.38 Million | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2020 | -4.68x | $-5.20 Million | $1.11 Million | ▼ -98.9% |
| 2019 | -2.35x | $-4.29 Million | $1.82 Million | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2018 | -2.96x | $-3.91 Million | $1.32 Million | ▲ +4.4% |
| 2017 | -3.10x | $-3.51 Million | $1.13 Million | ▲ +24.5% |
| 2016 | -4.11x | $-4.33 Million | $1.05 Million | ▲ +40.7% |
| 2015 | -6.92x | $-5.05 Million | $729.21K | ▼ -5217.4% |
| 2014 | -0.13x | $-2.14 Million | $16.43 Million | ▲ +40.2% |
| 2013 | -0.22x | $-2.10 Million | $9.64 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 2012 | -0.18x | $-1.84 Million | $10.13 Million | ▲ +39.6% |
| 2011 | -0.30x | $-1.97 Million | $6.54 Million | ▲ +23.2% |
| 2010 | -0.39x | $-1.98 Million | $5.05 Million | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2009 | -0.43x | $-1.78 Million | $4.15 Million | ▲ +22.4% |
| 2008 | -0.55x | $-2.10 Million | $3.81 Million | ▼ -147.5% |
| 2007 | -0.22x | $-1.72 Million | $7.71 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2006 | -0.57x | $-1.58 Million | $2.79 Million | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2005 | -0.46x | $-1.56 Million | $3.37 Million | ▼ -236.3% |
| 2004 | -0.14x | $-542.06K | $3.94 Million | ▼ -7.7% |
| 2003 | -0.13x | $-514.50K | $4.02 Million | ▲ +59.8% |
| 2002 | -0.32x | $-1.01 Million | $3.17 Million | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2001 | -0.21x | $-800.67K | $3.75 Million | ▲ +36.1% |
| 2000 | -0.33x | $-678.93K | $2.03 Million | ▼ -114.0% |
| 1999 | -0.16x | $-122.75K | $786.57K | ▲ +83.3% |
| 1998 | -0.93x | $-1.85K | $1.98K | ▲ +85.3% |
| 1997 | -6.34x | $-2.22K | $350.00 | — |