Aethlon Medical Inc (AEMD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Aethlon Medical Inc (AEMD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.87 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.34 Billion) in one year. See Aethlon Medical Inc free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Aethlon Medical Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Aethlon Medical Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore Aethlon Medical Inc (AEMD) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Aethlon Medical Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Aethlon Medical Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Aethlon Medical Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -3.42x | $-7.65 Million | $2.24 Million | ▲ +16.3% |
| 2024 | -4.09x | $-10.13 Million | $2.48 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 2023 | -4.30x | $-10.51 Million | $2.44 Million | ▼ -6.8% |
| 2022 | -4.03x | $-9.77 Million | $2.43 Million | ▲ +18.2% |
| 2021 | -4.92x | $-6.76 Million | $1.38 Million | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2020 | -4.68x | $-5.20 Million | $1.11 Million | ▼ -98.9% |
| 2019 | -2.35x | $-4.29 Million | $1.82 Million | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2018 | -2.96x | $-3.91 Million | $1.32 Million | ▲ +4.4% |
| 2017 | -3.10x | $-3.51 Million | $1.13 Million | ▲ +24.5% |
| 2016 | -4.11x | $-4.33 Million | $1.05 Million | ▲ +40.7% |
| 2015 | -6.92x | $-5.05 Million | $729.21K | ▼ -5217.4% |
| 2014 | -0.13x | $-2.14 Million | $16.43 Million | ▲ +40.2% |
| 2013 | -0.22x | $-2.10 Million | $9.64 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 2012 | -0.18x | $-1.84 Million | $10.13 Million | ▲ +39.6% |
| 2011 | -0.30x | $-1.97 Million | $6.54 Million | ▲ +23.2% |
| 2010 | -0.39x | $-1.98 Million | $5.05 Million | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2009 | -0.43x | $-1.78 Million | $4.15 Million | ▲ +22.4% |
| 2008 | -0.55x | $-2.10 Million | $3.81 Million | ▼ -147.5% |
| 2007 | -0.22x | $-1.72 Million | $7.71 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2006 | -0.57x | $-1.58 Million | $2.79 Million | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2005 | -0.46x | $-1.56 Million | $3.37 Million | ▼ -236.3% |
| 2004 | -0.14x | $-542.06K | $3.94 Million | ▼ -7.7% |
| 2003 | -0.13x | $-514.50K | $4.02 Million | ▲ +59.8% |
| 2002 | -0.32x | $-1.01 Million | $3.17 Million | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2001 | -0.21x | $-800.67K | $3.75 Million | ▲ +36.1% |
| 2000 | -0.33x | $-678.93K | $2.03 Million | ▼ -114.0% |
| 1999 | -0.16x | $-122.75K | $786.57K | ▲ +83.3% |
| 1998 | -0.93x | $-1.85K | $1.98K | ▲ +85.3% |
| 1997 | -6.34x | $-2.22K | $350.00 | — |