Agenus Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Agenus Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Agenus Inc (AGEN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.08x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-31.20 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($378.54 Million) in one year. Check AGEN cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Agenus Inc (1999–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Agenus Inc from 1999 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Agenus Inc across 27 annual periods. Check AGEN cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Agenus Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2025)
Agenus Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Agenus Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Agenus Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.31x | $-158.31 Million | $504.66 Million | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2024 | -0.30x | $-158.31 Million | $532.70 Million | ▲ +38.7% |
| 2023 | -0.48x | $-224.20 Million | $462.30 Million | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2022 | -0.37x | $-175.37 Million | $468.46 Million | ▼ -1642.6% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $10.14 Million | $418.05 Million | ▲ +107.4% |
| 2020 | -0.33x | $-139.10 Million | $426.01 Million | ▼ -575.8% |
| 2019 | -0.05x | $-18.68 Million | $386.67 Million | ▲ +88.5% |
| 2018 | -0.42x | $-131.09 Million | $310.95 Million | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2017 | -0.44x | $-94.23 Million | $214.22 Million | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2016 | -0.41x | $-79.96 Million | $196.11 Million | ▼ -48.2% |
| 2015 | -0.28x | $-47.18 Million | $171.50 Million | ▲ +62.9% |
| 2014 | -0.74x | $-38.23 Million | $51.51 Million | ▼ -49.4% |
| 2013 | -0.50x | $-19.53 Million | $39.32 Million | ▼ -2390.9% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $1.01 Million | $46.69 Million | ▲ +105.4% |
| 2011 | -0.40x | $-16.25 Million | $40.64 Million | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2010 | -0.32x | $-14.76 Million | $45.61 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 2009 | -0.38x | $-24.19 Million | $62.85 Million | ▼ -7.7% |
| 2008 | -0.36x | $-28.91 Million | $80.86 Million | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2007 | -0.29x | $-26.69 Million | $91.60 Million | ▲ +41.4% |
| 2006 | -0.50x | $-44.94 Million | $90.35 Million | ▲ +45.8% |
| 2005 | -0.92x | $-66.33 Million | $72.25 Million | ▲ +59.4% |
| 2004 | -2.26x | $-60.22 Million | $26.61 Million | ▼ -54.0% |
| 2003 | -1.47x | $-51.19 Million | $34.83 Million | ▲ +67.3% |
| 2002 | -4.50x | $-50.83 Million | $11.31 Million | ▼ -115.1% |
| 2001 | -2.09x | $-36.83 Million | $17.62 Million | ▼ -55.5% |
| 2000 | -1.34x | $-15.13 Million | $11.26 Million | ▲ +57.2% |
| 1999 | -3.14x | $-13.50 Million | $4.30 Million | — |