Akamai Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Akamai Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Akamai Technologies Inc (AKAM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $366.58 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($6.50 Billion) in one year. Check AKAM cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Akamai Technologies Inc (1999–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Akamai Technologies Inc from 1999 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Akamai Technologies Inc across 27 annual periods. Check how high is Akamai Technologies Inc's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Akamai Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2025)
Akamai Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Akamai Technologies Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Akamai Technologies Inc cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.23x | $1.52 Billion | $6.50 Billion | ▼ -15.6% |
| 2024 | 0.28x | $1.52 Billion | $5.49 Billion | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2023 | 0.25x | $1.35 Billion | $5.30 Billion | ▼ -21.3% |
| 2022 | 0.32x | $1.27 Billion | $3.94 Billion | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2021 | 0.39x | $1.40 Billion | $3.61 Billion | ▲ +12.5% |
| 2020 | 0.35x | $1.22 Billion | $3.51 Billion | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2019 | 0.32x | $1.06 Billion | $3.35 Billion | ▼ -28.9% |
| 2018 | 0.44x | $1.01 Billion | $2.27 Billion | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2017 | 0.62x | $800.98 Million | $1.29 Billion | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2016 | 0.76x | $871.81 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▲ +2.1% |
| 2015 | 0.74x | $793.45 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▲ +19.3% |
| 2014 | 0.62x | $658.07 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▼ -63.7% |
| 2013 | 1.72x | $563.91 Million | $328.25 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2012 | 2.08x | $530.02 Million | $254.87 Million | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2011 | 2.36x | $446.28 Million | $189.25 Million | ▲ +2.6% |
| 2010 | 2.30x | $402.45 Million | $175.07 Million | ▲ +88.9% |
| 2009 | 1.22x | $424.41 Million | $348.79 Million | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2008 | 1.10x | $343.49 Million | $312.18 Million | ▲ +38.1% |
| 2007 | 0.80x | $236.95 Million | $297.50 Million | ▲ +76.0% |
| 2006 | 0.45x | $132.72 Million | $293.24 Million | ▲ +46.1% |
| 2005 | 0.31x | $82.80 Million | $267.29 Million | ▲ +86.6% |
| 2004 | 0.17x | $51.24 Million | $308.67 Million | ▲ +518.9% |
| 2003 | -0.04x | $-18.00 Million | $454.30 Million | ▲ +76.0% |
| 2002 | -0.17x | $-65.76 Million | $397.95 Million | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2001 | -0.30x | $-119.28 Million | $404.24 Million | ▲ +7.2% |
| 2000 | -0.32x | $-122.87 Million | $386.38 Million | ▲ +80.9% |
| 1999 | -1.67x | $-32.32 Million | $19.40 Million | — |