Akamai Technologies Inc (AKAM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Akamai Technologies Inc (AKAM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $366.58 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($6.50 Billion) in one year. See AKAM financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Akamai Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Akamai Technologies Inc across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Akamai Technologies Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Akamai Technologies Inc (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Akamai Technologies Inc. Check Akamai Technologies Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.23x | $1.52 Billion | $6.50 Billion | ▼ -15.6% |
| 2024 | 0.28x | $1.52 Billion | $5.49 Billion | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2023 | 0.25x | $1.35 Billion | $5.30 Billion | ▼ -21.3% |
| 2022 | 0.32x | $1.27 Billion | $3.94 Billion | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2021 | 0.39x | $1.40 Billion | $3.61 Billion | ▲ +12.5% |
| 2020 | 0.35x | $1.22 Billion | $3.51 Billion | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2019 | 0.32x | $1.06 Billion | $3.35 Billion | ▼ -28.9% |
| 2018 | 0.44x | $1.01 Billion | $2.27 Billion | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2017 | 0.62x | $800.98 Million | $1.29 Billion | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2016 | 0.76x | $871.81 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▲ +2.1% |
| 2015 | 0.74x | $793.45 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▲ +19.3% |
| 2014 | 0.62x | $658.07 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▼ -63.7% |
| 2013 | 1.72x | $563.91 Million | $328.25 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2012 | 2.08x | $530.02 Million | $254.87 Million | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2011 | 2.36x | $446.28 Million | $189.25 Million | ▲ +2.6% |
| 2010 | 2.30x | $402.45 Million | $175.07 Million | ▲ +88.9% |
| 2009 | 1.22x | $424.41 Million | $348.79 Million | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2008 | 1.10x | $343.49 Million | $312.18 Million | ▲ +38.1% |
| 2007 | 0.80x | $236.95 Million | $297.50 Million | ▲ +76.0% |
| 2006 | 0.45x | $132.72 Million | $293.24 Million | ▲ +46.1% |
| 2005 | 0.31x | $82.80 Million | $267.29 Million | ▲ +86.6% |
| 2004 | 0.17x | $51.24 Million | $308.67 Million | ▲ +518.9% |
| 2003 | -0.04x | $-18.00 Million | $454.30 Million | ▲ +76.0% |
| 2002 | -0.17x | $-65.76 Million | $397.95 Million | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2001 | -0.30x | $-119.28 Million | $404.24 Million | ▲ +7.2% |
| 2000 | -0.32x | $-122.87 Million | $386.38 Million | ▲ +80.9% |
| 1999 | -1.67x | $-32.32 Million | $19.40 Million | — |