Akamai Technologies Inc (AKAM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Akamai Technologies Inc (AKAM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $366.58 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($6.50 Billion) in one year. See AKAM free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Akamai Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Akamai Technologies Inc across 27 annual periods. Also explore AKAM year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Akamai Technologies Inc (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Akamai Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Akamai Technologies Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.23x | $1.52 Billion | $6.50 Billion | ▼ -15.6% |
| 2024 | 0.28x | $1.52 Billion | $5.49 Billion | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2023 | 0.25x | $1.35 Billion | $5.30 Billion | ▼ -21.3% |
| 2022 | 0.32x | $1.27 Billion | $3.94 Billion | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2021 | 0.39x | $1.40 Billion | $3.61 Billion | ▲ +12.5% |
| 2020 | 0.35x | $1.22 Billion | $3.51 Billion | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2019 | 0.32x | $1.06 Billion | $3.35 Billion | ▼ -28.9% |
| 2018 | 0.44x | $1.01 Billion | $2.27 Billion | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2017 | 0.62x | $800.98 Million | $1.29 Billion | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2016 | 0.76x | $871.81 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▲ +2.1% |
| 2015 | 0.74x | $793.45 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▲ +19.3% |
| 2014 | 0.62x | $658.07 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▼ -63.7% |
| 2013 | 1.72x | $563.91 Million | $328.25 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2012 | 2.08x | $530.02 Million | $254.87 Million | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2011 | 2.36x | $446.28 Million | $189.25 Million | ▲ +2.6% |
| 2010 | 2.30x | $402.45 Million | $175.07 Million | ▲ +88.9% |
| 2009 | 1.22x | $424.41 Million | $348.79 Million | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2008 | 1.10x | $343.49 Million | $312.18 Million | ▲ +38.1% |
| 2007 | 0.80x | $236.95 Million | $297.50 Million | ▲ +76.0% |
| 2006 | 0.45x | $132.72 Million | $293.24 Million | ▲ +46.1% |
| 2005 | 0.31x | $82.80 Million | $267.29 Million | ▲ +86.6% |
| 2004 | 0.17x | $51.24 Million | $308.67 Million | ▲ +518.9% |
| 2003 | -0.04x | $-18.00 Million | $454.30 Million | ▲ +76.0% |
| 2002 | -0.17x | $-65.76 Million | $397.95 Million | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2001 | -0.30x | $-119.28 Million | $404.24 Million | ▲ +7.2% |
| 2000 | -0.32x | $-122.87 Million | $386.38 Million | ▲ +80.9% |
| 1999 | -1.67x | $-32.32 Million | $19.40 Million | — |