Akamai Technologies Inc (AKAM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Akamai Technologies Inc (AKAM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $366.58 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($6.50 Billion) in one year. Explore Akamai Technologies Inc long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Akamai Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Akamai Technologies Inc across 27 annual periods. Also explore Akamai Technologies Inc total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Akamai Technologies Inc (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Akamai Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see AKAM market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.23x | $1.52 Billion | $6.50 Billion | ▼ -15.6% |
| 2024 | 0.28x | $1.52 Billion | $5.49 Billion | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2023 | 0.25x | $1.35 Billion | $5.30 Billion | ▼ -21.3% |
| 2022 | 0.32x | $1.27 Billion | $3.94 Billion | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2021 | 0.39x | $1.40 Billion | $3.61 Billion | ▲ +12.5% |
| 2020 | 0.35x | $1.22 Billion | $3.51 Billion | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2019 | 0.32x | $1.06 Billion | $3.35 Billion | ▼ -28.9% |
| 2018 | 0.44x | $1.01 Billion | $2.27 Billion | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2017 | 0.62x | $800.98 Million | $1.29 Billion | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2016 | 0.76x | $871.81 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▲ +2.1% |
| 2015 | 0.74x | $793.45 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▲ +19.3% |
| 2014 | 0.62x | $658.07 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▼ -63.7% |
| 2013 | 1.72x | $563.91 Million | $328.25 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2012 | 2.08x | $530.02 Million | $254.87 Million | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2011 | 2.36x | $446.28 Million | $189.25 Million | ▲ +2.6% |
| 2010 | 2.30x | $402.45 Million | $175.07 Million | ▲ +88.9% |
| 2009 | 1.22x | $424.41 Million | $348.79 Million | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2008 | 1.10x | $343.49 Million | $312.18 Million | ▲ +38.1% |
| 2007 | 0.80x | $236.95 Million | $297.50 Million | ▲ +76.0% |
| 2006 | 0.45x | $132.72 Million | $293.24 Million | ▲ +46.1% |
| 2005 | 0.31x | $82.80 Million | $267.29 Million | ▲ +86.6% |
| 2004 | 0.17x | $51.24 Million | $308.67 Million | ▲ +518.9% |
| 2003 | -0.04x | $-18.00 Million | $454.30 Million | ▲ +76.0% |
| 2002 | -0.17x | $-65.76 Million | $397.95 Million | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2001 | -0.30x | $-119.28 Million | $404.24 Million | ▲ +7.2% |
| 2000 | -0.32x | $-122.87 Million | $386.38 Million | ▲ +80.9% |
| 1999 | -1.67x | $-32.32 Million | $19.40 Million | — |